Glycol ethers

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Rates for shipping containers from Asia to the US spiked again this week – and have almost doubled over the past four weeks – as demand has surged ahead of the possible reinstatement of tariffs while capacity remains tight. Supply chain advisors Drewry said the latest sudden, short-term strengthening in supply-demand balance in global container shipping has reversed the trend of declining rates which had started in January. Rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles spiked by 57% this week while rates from Shanghai to New York jumped by 39%, according to Drewry and as shown in the following chart. The drastic increases are seen from other shipping analysts as well. On the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI), the Shanghai-USWC rate rose by 58% to $5,172/FEU (40-foot equivalent unit), the largest week-on-week percentage gain since 2016 as strong demand has coincided with tight supply, though capacity is increasing as carriers resume previously suspended services and reinstate blank sailings. Sea-Intelligence CEO Alan Murphy said almost 400,000 TEUs (20-foot equivalent units) are coming back online in the near term. “If we aggregate it across June/July for Asia-USWC, then in June, the lines are increasing capacity 12.8% compared to before the tariff pause, and in July, the capacity injection is increasing to 16.5% compared to the pre-pause situation,” Murphy said. “Capacity has also ramped up sharply compared to just a week ago, with this injection of capacity equaling 397,000 TEU across the two months.” The growth in capacity is shown in the following chart from Sea-Intelligence. Peter Sand, chief analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said the spike is likely because shippers are so concerned about getting goods moving during the 90-day window that they are willing to pay more. “Right now, it seems carriers are telling shippers to jump, and some are replying ‘how high?’,” Sand said. “This will not last because capacity is heading back to the transpacific and the desperation of shippers to get supply chains moving again will ease once boxes are on the water and inventories begin to build up,” Sand said. “Spot rates are expected to peak in June before downward pressure returns.” Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos have yet to capture the dramatic increase, but Judah Levine, head of research at the company, said 1 June general rate increases (GRIs) are starting to push daily prices up sharply. “Rates have spiked 72% to the West Coast since last week to $4,765/FEU and 44% to the East Coast to $5,721/FEU, with more increases likely and additional hikes announced for mid-month,” Levine said. Analysts at US logistics platform provider Flexport said they expect a further rush of cargo from southeast Asia to the US West Coast toward the end of June. Flexport analysts expect carriers to be back to full capacity on the transpacific eastbound trade lane by the end of June, noting that week 23 capacity is 11% below standard levels but is expected to exceed standard levels by 3% by week 25. Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. LIQUID TANKER RATES US chemical tanker freight rates assessed by ICIS were mostly unchanged. However, rates decreased from the US Gulf to Europe. The USG to Rotterdam route is overall steady as weaker demand is being offset by limited availability, particularly for larger parcels. Larger requirements are well represented, with several larger lots of methanol, methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) and caustic soda fixed or indicated to the ARA. There was also some interest in sending some smaller lots of glycols and styrene. From the USG to Asia, the uptick in interest to rush glycols to beat the deadline to China seems to have all but ended as the market saw only a few new inquiries. On the other hand, several larger parcels of methanol were either fixed or quoted to the region. As contract of affreightment (COA) volumes are being firmed, and due to the absence of market participants, freight rates have eased some, with more downward pressure on smaller parcels. On the USG to Brazil trade lane, the market has been steady, leading rates to remain unchanged week on week. There was a stable level of spot activity with only a handful of new requirements. Overall, the market remains slow despite several cargoes being quoted and fixed. Despite the uptick in inquiries there is not enough significant activity that would suggest any increase in demand, with caustic soda, glycols and styrene the most active. The regular owners have space remaining and are trying to fill space while supporting current freight levels. Activity typically picks up during summer months, but this is not currently being seen. As a result, freight rates are now expected to remain steady for the time being. Focus story by Adam Yanelli Additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

05-Jun-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US delay of its proposed 50% tariffs on EU imports will still leave its polymers vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs. The new deadline is 9 July. For US exports, the EU has already drafted a list of targets for retaliatory tariffs, part of its second round of €95 billion in tariffs on US imports. A full list of all the proposed imports can be found here. This is on top of the first round of €21 billion in tariffs on US imports. A full list of all the proposed imports can be found here. In all, the EU could impose tariffs on nearly every major polymer from the US, including polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The EU is also considering tariffs on US imports of surfactants, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, and tall oil, a feedstock used to make renewable diesel, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable naphtha. The following table lists some of the many plastics and chemicals proposed on the EU's second round of tariffs. CN CODE DESCRIPTION 28151200 sodium hydroxide "caustic soda" in aqueous solution "soda lye or liquid soda" 29053926 butane-1,4-diol or tetramethylene glycol [1,4-butanediol] having a bio-based carbon content of 100% by mass 29091910 tert-butyl ethyl ether (ethyl-tertio-butyl-ether, etbe) 29152100 acetic acid 29153200 vinyl acetate 29291000 isocyanates 32061100 pigments and preparations based on titanium dioxide of a kind used for colouring any material or produce colorant preparations, containing >= 80% by weight of titanium dioxide calculated on the dry matter (excl. preparations of heading 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3212, 3213 and 3215) 32061900 pigments and preparations based on titanium dioxide of a kind used for colouring any material or produce colorant preparations, containing < 80% by weight of titanium dioxide calculated on the dry matter (excl. preparations of heading 3207, 3208, 3209, 3210, 3212, 3213 and 3215) 34023100 linear alkylbenzene sulphonic acids and their salts 34023990 anionic organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale (excl. linear alkylbenzene sulphonic acids and their salts, and aqueous solution containing by weight 30-50% of disodium alkyl [oxydi(benzenesulphonate)]) 34024100 cationic organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale 34024200 non-ionic organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale (excl. soap) 34024900 organic surface-active agents, whether or not put up for retail sale (excl. soap, anionic, cationic and non-ionic) 34025010 surface-active preparations put up for retail sale (excl. organic surface-active preparations in the form of bars, cakes, moulded pieces or shapes, and organic surface-active products and preparations for washing the skin in the form of liquid or cream) 38030010 crude tall oil 38030090 tall oil, whether or not refined (excl. crude tall oil) 38170050 linear alkylbenzene 38170080 mixed alkylbenzenes and mixed alkylnaphthalenes, produced by the alkylation of benzene and naphthalene (excl. linear alkylbenzene and mixed isomers of cyclic hydrocarbons) 38231100 stearic acid, industrial 38231200 oleic acid, industrial 38231300 tall oil fatty acids, industrial 38231910 fatty acids, distilled 38231930 fatty acid distillate 38231990 fatty acids, industrial, monocarboxylic; acid oils from refining (excl. stearic acid, oleic acid and tall oil fatty acids, distilled fatty acids and fatty acid distillate) 38237000 fatty alcohols, industrial 38260010 fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters, containing by weight => 96,5 % of esters "famae" 38260090 biodiesel and mixtures thereof, not containing or containing < 70 % by weight of petroleum oils or oils obtained from bituminous minerals (excl. fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters containing by weight >= 96,5 % of esters "famae") 39013000 ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, in primary forms 39019080 polymers of ethylene, in primary forms (excl. polyethylene, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, ethylene-alpha-olefins copolymers having a specific gravity of < 0,94, ionomer resin consisting of a salt of a terpolymer of ethylene with isobutyl acrylate and methacrylic acid and a-b-a block copolymer of ethylene of polystyrene, ethylene-butylene copolymer and polystyrene, containing by weight <= 35% of styrene, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms) 39021000 polypropylene, in primary forms 39023000 propylene copolymers, in primary forms 39029010 a-b-a block copolymer of propylene or of other olefins, of polystyrene, ethylene-butylene copolymer and polystyrene, containing by weight <= 35% of styrene, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms 39029020 polybut-1-ene, a copolymer of but-1-ene with ethylene containing by weight <= 10% of ethylene, or a blend of polybut-1-ene with polyethylene and/or polypropylene containing by weight <= 10% of polyethylene and/or <= 25% of polypropylene, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms 39031100 expansible polystyrene, in primary forms 39031900 polystyrene, in primary forms (excl. expansible) 39032000 styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers "san", in primary forms 39033000 acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers "abs", in primary forms 39039090 polymers of styrene, in primary forms (excl. polystyrene, styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers "san", acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene "abs", copolymer solely of styrene with allyl alcohol, of an acetyl value of >= 175 and brominated polystyrene, containing by weight >= 58% but <= 71% of bromine, in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms) 39041000 poly"vinyl chloride", in primary forms, not mixed with any other substances 39042100 non-plasticised poly"vinyl chloride", in primary forms, mixed with other substances 39042200 plasticised poly"vinyl chloride", in primary forms, mixed with other substances 39051200 poly"vinyl acetate", in aqueous dispersion 39051900 poly"vinyl acetate", in primary forms (excl. in aqueous dispersion) 39052100 vinyl acetate copolymers, in aqueous dispersion 39052900 vinyl acetate copolymers, in primary forms (excl. in aqueous dispersion) 39053000 poly"vinyl alcohol", in primary forms, whether or not containing unhydrolyzed acetate groups 39061000 poly"methyl methacrylate", in primary forms 39071000 polyacetals, in primary forms 39072911 polyethylene glycols, in primary forms 39072920 polyether alcohols, in primary forms (excl. bis(polyoxyethylene) methylphosphonate and polyethylene glycols) 39072999 polyethers in primary forms (excl. polyether alcohols, polyacetals and copolymer of 1- chloro-2,3-epoxypropane with ethylene oxide) 39073000 epoxide resins, in primary forms 39074000 polycarbonates, in primary forms 39075000 alkyd resins, in primary forms 39076100 poly"ethylene terephthalate", in primary forms, having a viscosity number of >= 78 ml/g 39076900 poly"ethylene terephthalate", in primary forms, having a viscosity number of < 78 ml/g 39079110 unsaturated liquid polyesters, in primary forms (excl. polycarbonates, alkyd resins, poly"ethylene terephthalate" and poly"lactic acid") 39079190 unsaturated polyesters, in primary forms (excl. liquid, and polycarbonates, alkyd resins, poly"ethylene terephthalate" and poly"lactic acid") 39079980 polyesters, saturated, in primary forms (excl. polycarbonates, alkyd resins, poly"ethylene terephthalate", poly"lactic acid", poly"ethylene naphthalene-2,6-dicarboxylate" and thermoplastic liquid crystal aromatic polyester copolymers) 39089000 polyamides, in primary forms (excl. polyamides-6, -11, -12, -6,6, -6,9, -6,10 and -6,12) 39091000 urea resins and thiourea resins, in primary forms 39092000 melamine resins, in primary forms 39093100 poly"methylene phenyl isocyanate" "crude mdi, polymeric mdi", in primary forms 39094000 phenolic resins, in primary forms 39095010 polyurethane of 2,2'-"tert-butylimino"diethanol and 4,4'-methylenedicyclohexyl diisocyanate, in the form of a solution in n,n-dimethylacetamide, containing by weight >= 50% of polymer 39095090 polyurethanes in primary forms (excl. polyurethane of 2,2'-"tert-butylimino"diethanol and 4,4'-methylenedicyclohexyl diisocyanate, in the form of a solution in n,ndimethylacetamide) Source: EU CN CODE DESCRIPTION 39011010 linear polyethylene with a specific gravity of < 0,94, in primary forms 39011090 polyethylene with a specific gravity of < 0,94, in primary forms (excl. linear polyethylene) 39012010 polyethylene in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms, of a specific gravity of >= 0,958 at 23°c, containing <= 50 mg/kg of aluminium, <= 2 mg/kg of calcium, of chromium, of iron, of nickel and of titanium each and <= 8 mg/kg of vanadium, for the manufacture of chlorosulphonated polyethylene 39012090 polyethylene with a specific gravity of >= 0,94, in primary forms (excl. polyethylene in blocks of irregular shape, lumps, powders, granules, flakes and similar bulk forms, of a specific gravity of >= 0,958 at 23°c, containing <= 50 mg/kg of aluminium, <= 2 mg/kg of calcium, of chromium, of iron, of nickel and of titanium each and <= 8 mg/kg of vanadium, for the manufacture of chlorosulphonated polyethylene) 39014000 ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of < 0,94 , in primary forms 39081000 polyamides-6, -11, -12, -6,6, -6,9, -6,10 or -6,12, in primary forms Source: EU

27-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Asia-US rates for shipping containers rose this week, leading ocean carriers to rush to ramp up capacity to handle an expected surge in bookings. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos rose by 3% to both US coasts, while rates from supply chain advisors Drewry showed a 2% increase on rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles and a 4% rise in rates from Shanghai to New York, as shown in the following chart. Following the latest US-China trade developments, Drewry expects an increase in spot rates in the coming week as carriers are reorganizing their capacity to accommodate a higher volume of cargo bookings from China. Kyle Beaulieu senior director, head of ocean Americas at Flexport, said during a webinar this week that carriers who initiated blank sailings and discontinued services to the US are now resuming services. Beaulieu said there were 10 China-US services that were halted, and as of today, six are planning to resume from Week 22 to Week 24. Beaulieu said ports in the Pacific Northwest have been the biggest beneficiaries so far as that is the shortest route to the US. Alan Murphy, CEO, Sea-Intelligence, said carriers who were reducing transpacific capacity due to the decrease in bookings from China amid 145% tariffs are now working to ramp up capacity prior to the 14 August deadline. This means that typical peak season volumes now must be shipped no later than mid-July. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, said there is still confusion on whether July and August deadlines mean goods need to be loaded at origins by those dates – as was the case with the 9 April tariff deadline – or that goods must arrive in the US by then. “The latter would significantly shorten these lower-tariff windows,” Levine said. “Ocean shipments from Asia would have to move in the next week or two to arrive before 9 July.” Levine noted that carriers have separately come out with mid-month general rate increases (GRIs) from $1,000-3,000/FEU (40-foot equivalent unit) and have similar GRIs planned for 1 June and 15 June with aims to get rates up to $8,000/FEU. “If successful, rate levels would be about on par with the Asia – US West Coast 2024 high reached last July,” Levine said. “Daily transpacific rates as of Monday have already increased about $1,000/FEU to the East Coast and $400/FEU to the West Coast to about $4,400/FEU and $2,800/FEU, respectively.” Container ships and costs for shipping containers are relevant to the chemical industry because while most chemicals are liquids and are shipped in tankers, container ships transport polymers, such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), are shipped in pellets. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is also shipped in containers. They also transport liquid chemicals in isotanks. LIQUID TANKER RATES HOLD STEADY US liquid chemical tanker freight rates as assessed by ICIS held steady this week despite upward pressure for several trade lanes. There is upward pressure on rates along the US Gulf-Asia trade lane as charterers are seeking to send cargos to the region following the pause on tariffs. The announcement caused a significant uptick in spot activity. The increase in interest should be significant but almost certainly short lived as cargoes rush to arrive prior to the 90-day expiration date. Several parcels of monoethylene glycol (MEG) and methanol were seen quoted in the market. Similarly, rates from the USG to Rotterdam were steady this week, even as space among the regular carriers remains limited. Contract tonnage continues to prevail and given the limited available space; spot demand remains relatively good. Several larger sized cargos of styrene, methanol, MTBE and ethanol were seen in the market. Several outsiders have come on berth for both May and June, adding to the available tonnage for completion cargos. Easing demand for clean tankers has attracted those vessels to enter the chemical sector. For the USG to South America trade lane, rates remain steady with a few inquiries for methanol and ethanol widely viewed in the market. Overall, the market was relatively quiet with fewer contract of affreightment (COA) nominations, putting downward pressure on rates as more space has become available. On the bunker side, fuel prices have declined as well, on the back of lower energy prices, as a result week over week were softer. Additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

23-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Asia-US container rates surged this week as trade between the US and China is expected to surge amid the 90-pause on reciprocal tariffs between the two nations. Rates from online freight shipping marketplace and platform provider Freightos showed minimal increases in the low-single digits, but rates from supply chain advisors Drewry showed significant increases of 19% from Shanghai to New York and 16% from Shanghai to Los Angeles, as shown in the following chart. Following the latest US–China trade developments, Drewry expects an increase in Transpacific spot rates in the coming week due to shortage in capacity. Peter Sand, chief analyst at ocean and freight rate analytics firm Xeneta, said the 90-day pause is expected to lead to a surge of activity, where spot rates will peak and then flatten as carriers redeploy capacity to match demand over the next two to four weeks. “The US-China announcement on the temporary lowering of tariffs fired the starting gun for shippers to rush as many imports as they can during the 90-day window of opportunity,” Sand said. “There is no time to waste for these shippers and the rush of cargo will put upward pressure on spot rates on Transpacific trades.” But Sand said that a deeper dive into data shows shippers paying prices towards the market mid-high for rates agreed post the US-China announcement, while legacy agreements struck before 12 May will continue to keep a lid on the bubbling market averages for a short time. The following chart shows Xeneta’s rates from North China to the US Gulf. Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, also expects to see a surge in imports. “We are likely to see a significant demand rebound in the near term as shippers replenish inventories that may have started to run down in the past month and as many Chinese manufacturers have high levels of finished goods already ready to ship,” Levine said. With an August deadline for the possible return of higher tariff levels, it is also likely that the near-term ocean demand rebound will mark the start of more frontloading, Levine said. “If so, it would also mark the early start of this year’s peak season, which could end earlier than usual as well for the same reasons,” Levine said. TANKER RATES STABLE TO LOWER US chemical tanker freight rates assessed by ICIS were stable to lower this week with rates for parcels from the US Gulf (USG) to Asia dropping once again. Rates from the USG to Asia ticked lower both for smaller parcels and larger parcels. Overall, market activity is weaker for most destinations to Asian ports, prompting owners to reposition tonnage to bridge the gap between southeast Asia and northern destinations. Overall, along this route there is very little quoted, aside from the usual contract of affreightment (COA) volumes there has not been much activity, besides the usual methanol and monoethylene glycol (MEG) cargoes. From the USG to Brazil, the market COA volumes remain steady as there were some inquiries and much less space is available for May for part cargoes, as COA nominations appear completed for the month. According to one ship broker, “owners are reporting very limited parcel space available”. The usual mix of caustic soda and methanol seems to be most visibly seen quoted in the market. For the USG to Rotterdam, there are some bits of cargo space still available for May. Most of the outsider vessels that were on berth have already sailed, and only the regulars remain at this time as they push tonnage availability which is all but full. However, there were steadier quotes styrene, methanol and caustic seen in the market this week for June loadings. Freight rates are now expected to remain steady for the time being. With additional reporting by Kevin Callahan Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Logistics: Impact on chemicals and energy topic page

16-May-2025

BANGKOK (ICIS)–Sluggish domestic demand weighed on Japan’s petrochemical industry, resulting in reduced production volumes in 2024 compared with previous years, according to the Japan Petrochemical Industry Association (JPCA). 2024 ethylene output falls 6.3% Production of five major plastics shrink by 5% Japan economy forecast to grow by 1.2% in 2025 “Although some crackers in Southeast Asia and East Asia are reducing production, there are plans for capacity increases in crackers that significantly exceed demand in China,” JPCA said in a report prepared for the Asia Petrochemical Industry Conference (APIC) 2025. The conference is being held in Bangkok, Thailand from 15-16 May. Operating rates of crackers in Japan are expected to remain lowered, as with previous years, JPCA said. Japan's ethylene production in 2024 fell 6.3% year on year to 4.99 million tonnes, as domestic crackers have operated at below 90% of capacity since August 2022, with the monthly average run rate falling below 80% five times in 2024. Japan’s real GDP growth rate in 2024 was 0.1% amid weak exports, neutral growth in private consumption, and a slight increase in government consumption. For the whole of 2024, the country’s total production of five major plastics – namely, linear density polyethylene (PE), high density PE (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) – declined to 5.7 million tonnes, lower by 5.2% from 2023. Production (in thousand tonnes) Product 2024 2023 % change Ethylene 4,989 5,324 -6.3 LDPE 1,160 1,219 -4.8 HDPE 656 665 -1.4 PP 1,935 2,075 -6.8 PS 549 564 -2.7 PVC 1,406 1,496 -6.0 Styrene monomer (SM) 1,297 1,428 -9.2 Ethylene glycol (EG) 276 264 4.6 Acrylonitrile (ACN) 303 341 -11.2 Sources: METI, Japan Styrene Industry Association (PS, SM) and Vinyl Environmental Council (PVC) Domestic demand as ethylene equivalent in 2024  inched up by 1.4% to 3.92 million tonnes, according to JPCA data. While the global economy is expected to grow steadily in 2025, there is a risk of deterioration in the global economy and a corresponding decline in demand due to geopolitical issues, JPCA said, citing Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the Israel-Hamas war, as well as the tariff policy of the US Trump administration. The latter has caused costs of raw material prices to soar, JPCA said. Meanwhile, Japan's real GDP growth rate for 2025 is projected to accelerate to 1.2%, supported by increased exports, sustained growth in personal consumption, and increases in capital investment, said JPCA. Higher wage hikes in 2025 should help boost domestic consumption, it said. In the report, JPCA called on the petrochemical industry to adopt new roles and responsibilities in achieving carbon neutrality and advancing a recycling-oriented society. The report outlined a two-stage timeline: first, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing facilities by immediately deploying currently available technologies; and second, to establish sustainable development goals by gradually introducing new technologies into society. “Not only corporate efforts but … collaboration and system design throughout the supply chain are required,” JPCA said. Focus article by Jonathan Yee

15-May-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–US-listed shares of chemical companies surged on Monday after the US and China agreed to a 90-day pause on the tariffs they imposed on each other since 2 April. The lower rates take effect on 14 May. For the US, it will lower its 2025 tariffs on Chinese imports to 30% from 145%. The 30% tariff is made up of the 20% fentanyl tariffs that the US adopted earlier in 2025 as well as the 10% baseline tariff that the US has imposed on most of the world. For China, it will cut its 2025 tariffs on US imports to 10% from 125%. The 10% tariff matches the baseline rate that the US has imposed on Chinese imports. China also suspended the non-tariff measures that it has taken since 2 April. The agreement does not mention the tariffs that China had imposed in February on a limited number of US imports, including liquefied natural gas (LNG). Nor does the agreement mention the restrictions on antimony and other minerals that China announced in December 2024 as well as those on bismuth and other minerals announced in February 2025. Monday's pause does not change the tariffs that the two countries adopted during the first term of US President Donald Trump. Still, the agreement removes a substantial amount of tariffs that had brought trade between the two countries to a standstill. The following table shows the major indices followed by ICIS. Index 12-May Change % Dow Jones Industrial Average 42,132.68 883.30 2.14% S&P 500 5,805.53 145.62 2.57% Dow Jones US Chemicals Index 820.86 15.57 1.93% S&P 500 Chemicals Industry Index 876.52 13.94 1.62% PAUSE WILL RESTORE TRADE BETWEEN US AND CHINAPrior to Monday's announcement, trade between the US and China had nearly halted. The US exported large amounts of polyethylene (PE) and monoethylene glycol (MEG) to China. China, in turn, exported large amounts of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), polyether polyols and polyester fibre to the US. The following charts show the chemical trade between the two countries. China imported large amounts of chemical feedstock from the US to supply its ethane crackers and propane dehydrogenation (PDH) units. China had supposedly waived its tariffs on US imports of ethane but maintained those on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The US imported large amounts of auto parts and other goods that incorporated large amounts of plastics and chemicals. The high US tariffs on Chinese goods caused China to divert shipments to southeast Asia and other parts of the world. Those increased shipments from China displaced locally manufactured goods, leading to a chain reaction that lowered demand for the plastics and chemicals that those local manufacturers used to make those products that were now being supplied by China. US CONTINUES TO ROLL BACK TARIFFSMonday's announcement is the most recent example of the US pausing its tariffs. These started with the pause that the US adopted on the 25% tariffs it imposed on imports from Canada and Mexico. Later, it paused the reciprocal tariffs that it imposed on most of the world on 2 April. The US maintained the 10% baseline tariffs that it announced that same day. The US later announced exemptions on semiconductors and electronics. Recently it reached an agreement with the UK that lowered the sectoral tariffs that the US imposed on automobile and other specific goods. PERFORMANCE OF US CHEM STOCKSThe following table shows the performance of the US-listed shares followed by ICIS. Name $ Current Price $ Change % Change AdvanSix 24.21 1.10 4.8% Avient 38.82 2.02 5.5% Axalta Coating Systems 32.73 1.63 5.2% Braskem 3.77 0.15 4.1% Chemours 11.88 0.82 7.4% Celanese 55.30 4.09 8.0% DuPont 71.17 4.40 6.6% Dow 31.34 1.86 6.3% Eastman 82.06 4.56 5.9% HB Fuller 56.59 2.06 3.8% Huntsman 12.96 0.91 7.6% Kronos Worldwide 7.63 0.35 4.8% LyondellBasell 60.80 3.87 6.8% Methanex 34.61 2.17 6.7% NewMarket 639.35 4.87 0.8% Ingevity 41.95 1.48 3.7% Olin 22.99 1.66 7.8% PPG 113.84 5.08 4.7% RPM International 114.26 3.73 3.4% Stepan 55.99 2.09 3.9% Sherwin-Williams 357.86 6.00 1.7% Tronox 5.78 0.53 10.1% Trinseo 2.62 0.10 4.0% Westlake 86.18 6.18 7.7% Thumbnail shows stock charts. Image by Shutterstock

12-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Click here to see the latest blog post on Asian Chemical Connections by John Richardson. China is in the process of drafting its 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030) in a geopolitical and economic environment that suggests the need for greater self-reliance. It might be fair to assume this will include a continued push toward petrochemical self-sufficiency. But China is to cap refinery capacity from 2027 onwards due to the rise of electric vehicles. This reduced need for gasoline could mean not enough new naphtha, LPG or other refinery feedstocks to support further petrochemical plant construction. China might instead import more feedstocks from the Middle East or continue to repurpose existing refineries to make more petrochemical feedstock. This is already the direction of travel through Saudi Aramco investments in China. Add rumours of coal-to-chemicals rationalisation and closures of older plants, and the picture gets even murkier. Conflicting reports say either China is slowing petrochemical construction following the trade war —or pressing ahead and raising operating rates to the mid-80% range (up from high-70s post-Evergrande Turning Point). Demand is another major variable. Growth was already slowing before the trade war and could now turn negative in 2025. A document from China Customs (25 April) pointed to possible waivers for US polyethylene and ethane imports—but not for ethylene glycol or propane. Nearly 60% of China’s propane imports came from the US in 2024. With a 125% tariff still in place, China would be unable to replace those volumes quickly, putting PDH propylene production under pressure. This matters: 32% of China’s propylene capacity is now PDH-based, and 70% of propylene is used to make PP. ICIS expects PDH operating rates to fall to below 59% in 2025 (from 70% in 2024). Could this mean a propylene shortage? Not necessarily. Output from crackers, refineries and coal could increase—especially if, as one Middle East source suggests, China pursues greater PP self-sufficiency. Taking into account all these variables, and the extent to which China can export PP based on the level of trade tensions, consider these scenarios for China’s PP net imports in 2025–2028: The ICIS Base Case: They average 3m tonnes/year. Alternative 1: 600,000 tonnes/year with some years of net exports Alternative 2: 1.4m tonnes/year, with again some years of net exports My gut feel is that China will do its best to boost petrochemicals self-sufficiency. But you cannot take my always fallible words as the final words. You must extend and deepen your scenario planning in this ever-murkier environment. Editor’s note: This blog post is an opinion piece. The views expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of ICIS.

06-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–SABIC swung to a net loss of Saudi riyal (SR) 1.21 billion ($323 million) in the first quarter on the back of higher feedstock prices and operating costs, the Saudi Arabian chemicals giant said on 4 May. in Saudi Riyal (SR) billion Q1 2025 Q1 2024 % Change Sales 34.59 32.69 5.8 EBITDA 2.5 4.51 -44.6 Net income -1.21 0.25 The company reported a Q1 revenue increase driven by higher sales volumes, though this gain was partially tempered by lower average selling prices, it said in a filing on the Saudi bourse, Tadawul. Despite this revenue growth, Q1 net profit faced pressure from a rise in other operating expenses, primarily due to a one-time SR 1.07 billion cost associated with a strategic restructuring expected to yield future cost reductions. QUARTER ON QUARTER PERFORMANCESABIC’s sales volume and average selling prices were relatively stable quarter over quarter, supported by higher production volumes in the chemicals and polymers units, although this was offset by lower overall sales volumes. In the first quarter, revenue of the petrochemicals segment was at SR31.5 billion, representing a quarter-over-quarter decrease of 1%, primarily driven by continued oversupply and weaker demand. While methanol prices improved, monoethylene glycol (MEG) prices were flat amid higher supply and weak demand, along with polypropylene (PP). Meanwhile, polyethylene (PE) prices were supported by global demand, but offset by additional supply. Polycarbonate (PC) prices were lower in the first quarter, mainly due to weak demand across major markets and oversupply. OUTLOOK Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) growth remained slow over the quarter, indicating business pessimism, SABIC CEO Abdulrahman Al-Fageeh said. “Our growth projects are progressing according to plan, including the Petrokemya MTBE plant and SABIC Fujian complex,” Al-Fageeh said. “We are focused on driving operational excellence, advancing transformation, and pursuing selective growth, while maintaining financial discipline and delivering long-term value,” added Al-Fageeh. SABIC projects an expenditure range of $3.5-4.0 billion for the year. SABIC is 70%-owned by energy giant Saudi Aramco. Thumbnail shows a SABIC production facility (Source: SABIC) ($1 = SR3.75)

05-May-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Asia's petrochemical markets are poised for a resurgence in activity following the May Day holidays, with discussions subdued as buyers await signs of recovery and producers restart plants over the coming months. Producers to restart plants, refill inventories after holidays Delayed purchases until after holidays US has contacted China for trade talks – Chinese state media The May Day or Labor Day holiday is celebrated in China from 1-5 May, and in most other Asian countries on 1 May. Japan and South Korea also observe several days of holiday in May. Feedstock propane supply-demand fundamentals are being weighed on by the ongoing US-China trade war, which is affecting the cost of propane imports and could lead to reduced operating rates for propane dehydrogenation (PDH) units. This may tighten propylene supply in the longer term, potentially supporting prices if demand picks up. Demand has been sluggish in the propylene market, weighing prices down as producers maintain low inventories ahead of 1 May. However, after the Labor Day holiday, there is an expectation of increased supply, which may lead to a more balanced supply-demand scenario as they resume normal operations. Separately, the glycerine market in Asia is expected to see a notable pick-up in restocking activities after the holidays. Chinese buyers, who have been holding back purchases due to a sluggish downstream epichlorohydrin (ECH) market and uncertainties surrounding the US-China trade war, are likely to return to the market. “We will wait until after the Labor Day holidays before we commit to any purchases as we expect the downstream ECH market to slow down after the holidays,” a Chinese buyer said. The ECH market, a key downstream sector for glycerine, is anticipated to experience a price drop after the holidays due to demand remaining weak amid the US-China trade war. Asia's butyl glycol (BG) import prices were assessed as lower this week amid a bearish market sentiment amid unimproved demand conditions. In southeast Asia, the glycol ethers market is undergoing price adjustments as producers lower offers in anticipation of the Labor Day holidays. China's export prices for propylene glycol ether (PGE) also softened as sellers looked to increase sales before the holiday. Meanwhile, propylene glycol prices are expected to remain stable as market participants await the outcomes of the holiday period. In China, domestic prices have held steady, but the overall sentiment remains cautious due to the impact of the holiday on production and logistics. The stability in pricing reflects balanced supply-demand fundamentals, though any unexpected disruptions post-holiday could lead to short-term volatility. PRODUCERS ADJUSTING OUTPUT The acetic acid market is experiencing softening spot prices due to lengthening supply as plants restart operations following maintenance turnarounds. However, the holiday period is likely to further influence supply dynamics, with some producers adjusting output to manage inventory levels. In China, a new plant tied to a downstream ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) unit has come online. It is among other plants in Asia with a combined capacity of nearly 1.8 million tonnes/year which have either already restarted or are restarting in May, EVA-linked vinyl acetate monomer (VAM) demand is generally expected to slow as June approaches, when a pricing policy in China – which has spurred a rush in solar panel installations across the country – comes into effect. Concerns of slowing demand were kept on the boil in Asia ethyl acetate (etac) markets amid fluid developments surrounding trade tensions between the US and China, and its potential ripple effect on sentiment in the days ahead. Notably, market players were conscious of weakening product spreads or etac production margins. Eroding margins have thus left regional suppliers with little room to scale back asking levels, despite the current market climate that was viewed as largely skewed towards buyers. EYES ON POSSIBLE TRADE TALKSAs the US-China trade war persists, both sides have indicated a willingness to engage with each other on trade talks. On Friday, a spokesperson of China’s Ministry of Commerce said that senior US officials have “repeatedly expressed their willingness” to negotiate with China on tariffs, according to state media outlet CCTV. The spokesperson said that the US has sent requests hoping to talk to China, and the Asian country is currently evaluating them. “China's position is consistent. If we fight, we will fight to the end; if we talk, the door is open,” the spokesperson said. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has maintained that trade talks are ongoing between the two largest economies in the world, which Chinese state media denied. Amid US tariffs, manufacturing activity continued to remain sluggish across Asia, including China and Japan. In April, China's manufacturing activity shrank as export orders weakened due to the escalating trade war with the US. The official purchasing managers' index (PMI) dropped to 49.0, indicating contraction, down from 50.5 in March. Japan's manufacturing PMI rose to 48.7 in April from 48.4 in March, marking the tenth consecutive month of contraction. Focus article by Jonathan Yee Additional reporting by Seymour Chenxia, Helen Yan, Julia Tan, Joy Foo and Matthew Chong and Melanie Wee.

02-May-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–Europe's oxo-alcohols and derivatives markets have been largely characterized by uncertainty and cautious behavior. Offtake from the coatings sector but increases in spring, but sentiment is subdued as players are struggling to plan amid ongoing tariff uncertainty and wider economic weakness. Oxo-alcohols and butyl acetate reporter Marion Boakye joins acrylate esters editor Mathew Jolin-Beech and glycol ethers editor Cameron Birch to discuss current conditions along the oxo-alcohols value chain.  

29-Apr-2025