Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The threat of additional US tariffs, retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, and their potential impact is fostering a heightened level of uncertainty, dampening consumer, business and investor sentiment, along with clouding the 2025 outlook for chemicals and economies. The US chemical industry, a massive net exporter of chemicals and plastics to the tune of over $30 billion annually, is particularly exposed to retaliatory tariffs. Chemical company earnings guidance for Q1 and all of 2025 is already subdued, with the one common theme from the investor calls being little-to-no help expected from macroeconomic factors this year. Tariffs only cloud the outlook further. Tariffs have long been a feature of US economic and fiscal policy. In the period to the 1940s, tariffs were used as a major revenue source to fund the federal government before the introduction of the income tax and were also used to protect domestic industries. After 1945, a neo-liberal world order arose, which resulted in a lowering of tariffs and other trade barriers and the rise of globalization. With the collapse of the Doha Round of trade negotiations in 2008, this drive stalled and began to reverse. Heading into this year’s International Petrochemical Conference (IPC) hosted by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), it is clear that the neo-liberal world order has ended. Rising geopolitical tensions and logistics issues from COVID led many firms to diversify supply chains, leading to reshoring benefiting India, Southeast Asia, Mexico and others, and to the rise of a multi-polar world. It is also resulting in the rise of tariffs and other trade barriers around the world, most notably as US trade policy. FLUID US TRADE POLICYThe US administration’s policy stance on tariffs has been very fluid, changing from day to day. It is implementing 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports on 12 March and has already placed additional tariffs of 20% on all imports from China as of 4 March (10% on 4 February, plus 10% on 4 March). On 11 March, the US announced steel and aluminium tariffs on Canada would be ramped up to 50% in retaliation for Canadian province Ontario placing 25% tariffs on electricity exports to the US. Later, Ontario suspended the US electricity surcharge, and the US did not impose the 50% steel and aluminium tariff. The US had placed 25% tariffs on imports from Canada (10% on energy) and Mexico on 4 March but then on 5 March exempted automotive and then on 6 March announced a pause until 2 April. China retaliated by implementing 15% tariffs on US imports of meat, fish and various crops, along with liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal. Canada retaliated with 25% tariffs on C$30 billion worth of goods on 4 March and then with the US pause, is delaying a second round of tariffs on C$125 billion of US imports until 2 April. Mexico planned to retaliate on 9 March but has not following the US pause. US President Trump has also threatened the EU with 25% tariffs. We have a trade war and as 1960s Motown artist Edwin Starr sang, “War, huh, yeah… What is it good for?… Absolutely nothing.” Canada, Mexico and China are the top three trading partners of the US, collectively making up over 40% of US imports and exports. The three North American economies, until recently, had low or non-existent tariffs on almost all of the goods they trade. This dates back to the 1994 NAFTA free trade agreement, which was renegotiated in 2020 as the USMCA (US-Mexico-Canada Agreement). A reasoning behind the tariff threats on Canada and Mexico is to force Canada and Mexico to stop illegal drugs and undocumented migrants from crossing into the US. These tariffs were first postponed in early February after both countries promised measures on border security, but apparently more is desired. But the US also runs big trade deficits with both countries. Here, tariffs are seen by the administration as the best way to force companies that want US market access to invest in US production. IMPACT ON AUTOMOTIVEUS automakers are the most exposed end market to US tariffs and potential retaliatory tariffs, as their supply chains are even more highly integrated with Mexico and Canada following the USMCA free trade deal in 2020. The USMCA established Rules of Origin which require a certain amount of content in a vehicle produced within the North America trading partners to avoid duties. For example, at least 75% of a vehicle’s Regional Value Content must come from within the USMCA partners – up from 62.5% under the previous NAFTA deal. Supply chains are deeply intertwined. In the North American light vehicle industry, materials, parts and components can cross borders – and now potential tariff regimes – more than six times before a finished vehicle is delivered to the dealer’s lot. US prices for those goods will likely rise. The degree to which they rise (extent to which tariffs costs will pass through) depends upon availability of alternatives, structure of the domestic industry and pricing power, and currency movements. In addition, some of the Administration’s polices dealing with deregulation, energy, and tax will have a mitigating effect on the negative impact of tariffs for the US. The 25% steel and aluminium tariffs will add nearly $1,500 to the cost of a light vehicle and will result in lower sales for the automotive industry which has been plagued in recent years by affordability issues. If it had been implemented, the 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports from Canada would only compound the pricing impact. All things being equal, 25% tariffs on the metals would push down sales by about 525,000 units but some of the favorable factors cited above as well as not all costs being passed through to consumers will partially offset the effects of higher metal prices. Partially is the key word. Since so many parts, components, and finished vehicles are produced in Canada and Mexico, US 25% tariffs on all imports from Canada and Mexico would add further to the price effects. The economic law of demand holds that as prices of a good rise, demand for the good will fall. ECONOMIC IMPACTTariffs will dampen demand across myriad industries and markets, and could add to inflation. By demand, we mean the aggregate demand of economists as measured by GDP. Aggregate demand primarily consists of consumer spending, business fixed investment, housing investment, and government purchases of goods and services. Tariffs would likely add to inflation but the effects would begin to dissipate after a year or so. By themselves, the current round of tariffs on steel and aluminium and on goods from Canada, Mexico and China will dampen demand due to higher prices. Plus, as trading partners retaliate, US exports would be at risk. Preliminary estimates suggest the annual impact from these tariffs – in isolation – on US GDP during the next three years could average 1.4 percentage points from baseline GDP growth. Keep in mind that there are many moving parts to the economy and that the more favorable policies could offset some of this and, as a result, the average drag on GDP could be limited to a 0.5 percentage point reduction from the baseline. POTENTIAL GDP IMPACT OF US TARIFFS – 20% ON CHINA, 25% ON MEXICO AND CANADA Real GDP is a good proxy for what could happen in the various end-use markets for plastic resins and the reduction of US economic growth. In outlying years, however, tariffs could support reshoring and business fixed investment. The hits on Mexico and Canada would be particularly. China’s economic growth would be affected as well. But China can shift exports to other markets. Mexico and Canada have fewer options. Resilience will be key to growing uncertainty and will lead to shifting trade patterns and new market opportunities. This is where scenarios, sound planning and strategies, and leadership come into play. US EXPORTS AT RISK, SUPPLY CHAINS TO SHIFTUS PE exports are particularly vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs. The US is specifically targeting tariffs on countries and regions that absorb around 52% of US PE exports – China, the EU, Mexico and Canada, according to an ICIS analysis. Aside from PE, the US exports major volumes of PP, ethylene glycol (EG), methanol, PVC, styrene and vinyl chloride monomer (VCM), along with base oils to countries and regions targeted with tariffs. The US exports nearly 50% of PE production with China and Mexico being major outlets. China has only a 6.5% duty on imports of US PE, having provided its importers with waivers in February 2020 that took rates to pre-US-China trade war levels. The US-China trade war under the first US Trump administration started in 2018 with escalating tariffs on both sides, before a phase 1 deal was struck in December 2019 that removed some tariffs and reduced others. After the waivers offered by China to importers in February 2020, US exports of PE and other ethylene derivatives surged before falling back in 2021 from the COVID impact. They then rocketed higher through 2023 and remained at high levels in 2024. Since 2017, the year before the first US-China trade war, US ethylene and derivative exports to China are up more than 4 times, leaving them more exposed than ever to China. With tariff escalation, chemical trade flows would shift dramatically. Just one example is in isopropanol (IPA). Shell in Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, produces IPA, of which over 85% is shipped to the US, mainly to the northeast customers, said ICIS senior market analyst Manny Borges. “It is a better supply chain for the customers instead of shipping product from the US Gulf,” said Borges. “With the increase in tariffs, we will see several customers shifting volumes to domestic producers or countries where the tariffs are not applied,” he added. US IPA producers are running their plants at around 67% of capacity on average and have sufficient capacity to supply the entire domestic market, the analyst pointed out. This dynamic, where US producers supply more of the local market versus imports, would likely play out across multiple product chains as well, especially in olefins where the US is more than self-sufficient. Even as the US is more than self-sufficient in, and a big net exporter of PE, ethylene glycols, polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), it imports significant quantities from Canada. In the event of a 25% tariff on imports from Canada, US producers could easily fill the gap, although logistics would have to be reworked. Hosted by the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), the IPC takes place on 23-25 March in San Antonio, Texas. Visit the US tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Visit the Macroeconomics: Impact on chemicals topic page Insight article by Kevin Swift and Joseph Chang

12-Mar-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–US-listed shares of chemical companies fell sharply – many by more than 5% – on Monday as the US proceeds with plans to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, its three biggest trading partners. The selloff in chemical shares was sharper than that for the general market. The following table shows the stock indices followed by ICIS. Index 3-Mar Change % Dow Jones Industrial Average 43,191.24 -649.67 -1.48% S&P 500 5,849.72 -104.78 -1.76% Dow Jones US Chemicals Index 851.42 -17.99 -2.07% S&P 500 Chemicals Industry Index 901.32 -17.93 -1.95% Shares of every US-listed company followed by ICIS fell. TUESDAY'S TARIFFSUnless the nations reach last-minute deals, the US will impose 25% tariffs on all imports from Mexico, 10% tariffs on all energy imports from Canada and 25% tariffs on all other imports from Canada. The US will also proceed with an additional 10% that it proposed on all imports from China, according to a post from the White House’s Rapid Response account on social media platform X. This is on top of the 10% in new tariffs that the US already imposed earlier in 2025 on imports from China. EFFECT ON US MARKETSWhile the US has large trade surpluses in polyethylene (PE), it still imports large amounts of the plastic from Canada. Many of these imports go to processors in the bordering states of Illinois, Michigan and Ohio. These states are far from most of the plastic plants in the US, which are concentrated in Texas and Louisiana. Processors in these states that border Canada will need to pay the tariffs or pay higher shipping costs to secure material from suppliers farther away. The US also imports notable amounts of purified terephthalic acid (PTA) from Canada and Mexico as well as methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) from China. The US receives large Canadian shipments of ammonia and potassium chloride, which is also known as muriate of potash (MOP). At least one company, Canada's Chemtrade Logistics, said it expected to pass a larger part of the tariffs to its customers. Chemtrade Logistics exports sodium chlorate, chlorine and sulfuric acid to the US. RETALIATIONChina already has retaliated by imposing tariffs on US imports of coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG), crude oil, farm equipment and some vehicles. China has restricted exports of antimony and bismuth. Antimony is used to make catalysts for polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and bismuth is used to make catalysts for polyurethanes. Canada had proposed retaliatory tariffs of 25% on Canadian dollars (C$) 155 billion ($107 billion) worth of US imports. The tariffs would be imposed in two phases. The first phase would cover C$30 billion of US imports of beverages, cosmetic, paper products and some finished plastics products, among others. Canada was preparing a second list, worth C$125 billion. All three countries could impose retaliatory tariffs on the substantial exports of PE, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and other ethylene derivatives from the US. OTHER POSSIBLE US TARIFFSThe US has threatened to impose tariffs of 25% on imports from the EU. On 12 March, the US will impose tariffs of 25% on all imports of steel and aluminium, a move that will remove exemptions that it granted to some countries. The US will expand the tariff to cover more products made of steel and aluminium. In early April, the US said it would introduce retaliatory tariffs on imports from the rest of the world. These tariffs will consider what the US considers non-tariff trade barriers, such as value added tax (VAT) systems. CHEM STOCK PERFORMANCEThe following table shows the performances of US-listed shares followed by ICIS. Symbol Name $ Current Price $ Change % Change ASIX AdvanSix 26.82 -1.10 -3.94% AVNT Avient 41.23 -1.54 -3.60% AXTA Axalta Coating Systems 35.1 -1.11 -3.07% BAK Braskem 3.52 -0.17 -4.61% CC Chemours 13.86 -1.09 -7.29% CE Celanese 47.02 -3.92 -7.70% DD DuPont 78.83 -2.53 -3.11% DOW Dow 36.06 -2.05 -5.38% EMN Eastman 94.46 -3.39 -3.46% FUL HB Fuller 55.73 -1.01 -1.78% HUN Huntsman 16.04 -0.89 -5.26% KRO Kronos Worldwide 8.43 -0.32 -3.66% LYB LyondellBasell 73.41 -3.42 -4.45% MEOH Methanex 41.47 -2.57 -5.84% NEU NewMarket 562.65 -7.46 -1.31% NGVT Ingevity 45.24 -2.42 -5.08% OLN Olin 23.87 -1.52 -5.99% PPG PPG 111.72 -1.50 -1.32% RPM RPM International 123.09 -0.80 -0.65% SCL Stepan 58 -3.375 -5.50% SHW Sherwin-Williams 356.73 -4.75 -1.31% TROX Tronox 7.02 -0.615 -8.06% TSE Trinseo 4.62 -0.30 -6.10% WLK Westlake 108.71 -3.59 -3.20% ($1 = C$1.45) Please also visit the US tariff, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page Thumbnail shows money. Image by ICIS.

04-Mar-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US will proceed with its proposed 25% tariffs on most goods from Canada and Mexico, and the nation will increase tariffs on imports from China by another 10%, all effective on 4 March, the president said on Thursday. In addition, the US will proceed with its proposed reciprocal tariffs on 2 April, President Donald Trump said on social media. The 4 March date still leaves time for the US to reach some agreement with Canada or Mexico to cancel or delay the proposed tariffs. The US agreed to a 30-day delay with Canada and Mexico on 3 February, the day before it had initially planned to impose the tariffs. On Wednesday, 26 February, Mexico's president said such an agreement was in the works. No agreement was reached with China, so the 10% tariffs went into effect. China retaliated by imposing tariffs on US imports of coal, liquefied natural gas (LNG), crude oil, farm equipment and some vehicles. RATIONAL FOR THE TARIFFSThe US will proceed with the tariffs, because Trump said illegal drugs that are made in China continue to enter the country from Canada and Mexico. "Drugs are still pouring into our Country from Mexico and Canada at very high and unacceptable levels. A large percentage of these Drugs, much of them in the form of Fentanyl, are made in, and supplied by, China," Trump said on social media. "We cannot allow this scourge to continue to harm the USA, and therefore, until it stops, or is seriously limited, the proposed TARIFFS scheduled to go into effect on MARCH FOURTH will, indeed, go into effect, as scheduled. China will likewise be charged an additional 10% Tariff on that date." THE PROPOSED TARIFFSUnder the proposal, the US will impose tariffs of 25% on all imports from Mexico. It would impose tariffs of 25% on all Canadian imports except energy. Energy imports from Canada would receive tariffs of 10%. Canada had already proposed retaliatory tariffs of 25% on Canadian dollar (C$) 155 billion ($108 billion) worth of US imports. The tariffs would be imposed in two phases. The first phase would cover C$30 billion of US imports of beverages, cosmetic, paper products and some finished plastics products, among others. Canada was preparing a second list, worth C$125 billion. EFFECT ON CHEMICALSCanada is a large source of imports of polyethylene (PE) to plastic processing hubs in the bordering states of Michigan, Illinois and Ohio. In addition, Canada exports PE to Texas. Canada also exports notable amounts of polypropylene (PP) and ammonia to the US. The nation accounts for nearly 90% of all US imports of potassium chloride, also known as muriate of potash (MOP). Mexico and Canada export meaningful amounts of purified terephthalic acid (PTA) to the US. China exports notable amounts of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI). Mexico and China are important sources of the main feedstock used to make fluorochemicals and fluoropolymers. OTHER TARIFFS PROPOSALS The US has threatened to impose tariffs of 25% on imports from the EU. On 12 March, the US will impose tariffs of 25% on all imports of steel and aluminium, a move that will remove exemptions that it granted to some countries. The US will expand the tariff to cover more products made of steel and aluminium. Please also visit the US tariff, policy – impact on chemicals and energy topic page ($1 = C$1.44) Thumbnail photo: Containers. (By XINHUA/Shutterstock)

27-Feb-2025

Correction: In the ICIS article headlined "US imports record setting 492,101 tonnes of plastic scrap in 2024 as tariffs loom" dated 26 February, please read in the second paragraph … 250,961 tonnes in 2024 … instead of … 59,222 … A corrected article follows. HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US has maintained its status as a net importer of plastic scrap, bringing in a record volume of 492,101 tonnes in 2024 according to recently released data from the US International Trade Commission (ITC). Leading the way, imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) scrap have broken their own record, at 250,961 tonnes in 2024, making up roughly 49% of plastic scrap imports. At the same time, PET scrap exports to Mexico reached record highs, coming in at 46,307 tonnes in 2024, a 32% increase year on year (YoY). As Canada remains the top trade partner for US plastic scrap, it remains to be seen what will happen should the US continue to impose trade tariffs and duties on imported goods. Canada remains largest scrap trade partner amid tariff threat PET scrap imported into US increased 23% YoY PET scrap exported to Mexico increased 32% YoY ANNUAL DATA BREAK RECORDS, QUARTERLY DATA SOFTENSFull year 2024 trade data from the US Census Bureau shows US imports of plastic scrap – noted by the Harmonized System (HS) code 3915 – have increased 10% YoY. Plastic scrap imports include items such as used bottles but also other forms of recycled feedstock such as purge, leftover pairings and flake material. Recently, the US Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) issued statements to several importers of PET flake that the HS code 3907 which designates PET resin should be used instead, thus it is expected the US actually imported more PET flake than represented in these numbers. Throughout 2024, stagnant PET bottle collection volumes, paired with increasing bottle exports, led to a need for imported PET scrap material. This was further supported by the cost proposition of cheaper imported flake. As a result, recycled flake imports are seen as both a help and harm to the broader US recycling market. When broken down by country, Canada remains the leader of PET scrap imports, followed by Thailand, Ecuador and Japan. Canada continues to give up market share despite volumes increasing 2% YoY. This pales in comparison to the rapid export volume growth from Thailand, Japan and Ecuador, at an increase of 68%, 75%, and 29% YoY, respectively. Market participants confirmed they saw a notable rise in imported recycled resin activity from Asia and Latin America, particularly due to their cost-competitive position when it comes to feedstock, labor, and facility costs related to recycling. Asian countries now account for more than 44% of PET scrap imports, compared to the 26% market share from Canada and Mexico. In 2023, the Canada/Mexico market share was at 34%, and was as high as 44% in 2022, showing a complete reversal over the last few years. Imports of all other subcategories of plastic scrap, including polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinylchloride (PVC), were relatively steady. When looking at PE scrap imports, they decreased marginally in 2024 (1%), and Canada/Mexico remain the largest exporters to the US at 69% and 18% of PE scrap imports respectively. Despite the strong annual data, Q4 data individually did show some weakness. In comparison to Q4 2023, Q4 2024 was down 7% as 2023 data was unusually strong. Scrap imports typically slow at the end of the year as players reduce inventory ahead of year end accounting, thus it comes as no surprise that Q4 imports were down 6% compared to Q3 imports. When looking at Q4 specifically, PET scrap imports  were down 16% compared to Q3 and down 9% compared to Q4 2023. For the full breakdown of US plastic scrap imports, click here to see the latest numbers. TOTAL EXPORTS DOWN, PET EXPORTS UPThough total US plastic scrap exports fell 2% in 2024, exports of PET scrap, largely in the form of bales, jumped 24% YoY. Mexico in particular continues to be a key end market for US PET bale material, making up 57% of the 81,018 tonnes exported. This resulted in 46,307 tonnes of material being sent to Mexico, an increase of 32% YoY. While the US has always exported a portion of domestic PET bale material to other countries, exports to Mexico surged over the last year. This growing trade relationship is largely attributed to new capacity in Mexico, paired with strong local demand which has elevated local bale prices. Mexican recyclers have been purchasing US PET bales as a lower-cost option with higher availability. Exports of US bales to Mexico – particularly from the southern areas of the US such as Texas and parts of California – continue to challenge domestic recyclers who struggle to secure adequate volumes of bale feedstock. As export demand continues put upwards pressure on bale pricing, local recyclers find themselves stuck between rising feedstock costs and very competitive import virgin and recycled pricing, thus unable to pass along those increased costs. PET scrap exports were also sent to Malaysia and Vietnam, at 12% and 7% of PET exports respectively. Overall, exports of other types of plastic scrap continue to slow, following the Chinese National Sword and Basel Convention adoption several years ago. Total plastic scrap exports in Q4 were down QoQ and YoY. PE continues to be a leading polymer type for US plastic scrap exports, representing 35% of total plastic scrap exports. India receives over a quarter of US PE scrap material followed by Canada at 16%. For the full breakdown of US plastic scrap exports, click here to see the latest numbers. TARIFFS BETWEEN CANADA, MEXICO TO IMPACT RECYCLINGA tariff decision on imports from Mexico and Canada could come as soon as next Tuesday, 4 March. From a bale or flake feedstock perspective, some northern and southern US recyclers will source material from Canada and Mexico, which would result in elevated feedstock pricing either from the tariffs themselves or the resultant increase in domestic feedstock demand. On the finished post-consumer recycled (PCR) flake and resin side, US customers who purchase materials from Canadian or Mexican recyclers may instead seek volumes from US recyclers which could support some struggling players or further strain players whose facilities are already running at high capacity. Retaliatory tariffs from either country could harm exports of US plastic scrap material. Canada and Mexico were the top countries for plastic scrap exports – 34% and 21%, respectively. Waste and recycling has always been a regional business, and any barriers that prevent regional dynamics could lead to negative consequences for recycling market viability.

26-Feb-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Before Westlake would consider expanding ethylene capacity at a joint-venture cracker, it would need to conduct a cost analysis that would take into account higher labor and material costs caused by inflation, the chief financial officer said on Monday. The additional ethylene could be used by Westlake's vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) plant in Geismar, Louisiana, which it is expanding. Westlake has not provided an update on when that VCM expansion project could start operations. The additional VCM capacity would require ethylene from the merchant market. Westlake could reduce its exposure to the merchant market by increasing its ethylene capacity. One option for Westlake would be to expand its joint-venture cracker in Westlake Louisiana. Westlake has a 50% stake with Lotte Chemical in the LACC joint venture. "It is important that we find a way to cost effectively be able to try to shorten that merchant position in ethylene," said Steven Bender, chief financial officer. He made his comments during an earnings conference call. "But we want to do this in a cost-effective, value-added way," he said. Westlake could achieve that through a number of ways, including a debottlenecking project at the joint venture cracker, Bender said. The joint venture cracker could be expanded by about 40%, Bender said. If Lotte participates, Westlake would be entitled to half of the ethylene produced by the expansion project. Westlake would then need to get a fresh estimate about the cost of the project on a dollar per pound investment basis, Bender said. "As we all know, there has been labor inflation and materials cost inflation, so I would not want to rely on anything that we have done in the last couple of years as an indicator of capital cost for that," he said. Bender did not provide any estimates about cost inflation, and he did not specify any causes of the cost increases. OTHER PROJECTS SAW COST INFLATIONOther companies reported in 2023 large cost increases that led some to delay or cancel projects. Alpek, Indorama and Far Eastern New Century (FENC) temporarily halted work on an integrated polyester plant because of high costs. Phillips 66 said the project costs for its renewable diesel project in California rose by more than 40%. Chemtrade Logistics put on hold its ultrapure sulfuric acid plant project after costs rose by 50%. RESUMPTION OF STEEL, ALUMINUM TARIFFSConstruction costs could rise further after tariffs of 25% go into effect on 12 March on imports of steel and aluminum products. The following will take place under the tariff order: The US will withdraw the exemptions to the 25% steel tariffs that it granted to South Korea, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Mexico, the EU, Japan, the UK and Ukraine. More steel products will fall under the tariff. The US will restrict the ability for companies to seek exemptions from the duties. The US will raise its tariff on imports of aluminum to 25% from 10% while terminating agreements it had reached with Argentina, Australia, Canada, Mexico, the EU and the UK. The 25% tariff will cover more aluminum products. Thumbnail shows pipe composed of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), which is made from VCM. Image by Shutterstock.

24-Feb-2025

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Here are the top stories from ICIS News from the week ended 14 February. IPEX: Asia finding a floor, up 1%; PVC and PP drive 1.3% index fall in Europe; USG toluene firms The ICIS Petrochemical Index (IPEX) for January shows that northeast Asian chemical markets may be finding a floor after two consecutive months of declines, with the regional index up 1% – only its second gain in six months, driven by a 14.7% surge in butadiene due to rising crude oil costs. US higher steel tariffs could backfire, reduce capex in chemical, industrial plants – ICIS economist Potential US 25% tariffs on steel and other metals could ultimately reduce capital expenditure (capex) in chemicals and industrial plants as costs rise, according to an economist at ICIS. US’ 25% tariffs on all steel, aluminium imports start 12 March The US will start imposing 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminium imports starting 12 March, under the executive order signed by US President Donald Trump on 11 February. INSIGHT: EU-Chile trade deal could benefit chemicals indirectly via higher minerals supply (part 1) An interim trade accord between Chile and the EU kicked off on 1 February and the 27-country bloc is not shy about its main objective: get preferential access to the Latin American nation’s vast resources of raw materials. INSIGHT: US reciprocal tariffs would have little direct impact on commodity chemicals markets – analysis The threat of US reciprocal tariffs is the latest wrinkle in US trade policy, spurring players to game out potential impacts. For the US chemical industry, there should be little direct impact on commodity markets as imports largely originate from Canada and South Korea – countries that already have free trade agreements with the US. Americas Styrenics sale process delayed as better market conditions expected later in 2025 – Trinseo The potential sale of Americas Styrenics (AmSty) – the 50/50 joint venture between Trinseo and Chevron Phillips Chemical (CP Chem) is being delayed as better market conditions are expected later in 2025, said the CEO of Trinseo. Reciprocal tariffs will match taxes on US goods by other countries; to take effect in April The US plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on all countries as early as 2 April once the required investigations have taken place, President Donald Trump said on Thursday. INSIGHT: US mulls reciprocal tariffs on Brazil ethanol, cabinet hopes steel quota is to be kept Although the new US administration has so far only imposed tariffs on China, President Donald Trump keeps using the tariff threat as a form of negotiation and in the latter part of this week it was the turn of Brazil’s ethanol.

17-Feb-2025

LONDON (ICIS)–Here are some of the top stories from ICIS Europe for the week ended 14 February. Europe MX and PX chemical value chain braces for headwinds amid downstream closures and tariff threats Downstream demand for mixed xylenes (MX) and paraxylene (PX) in Europe has been limited at the start of 2025, with permanent shutdowns and the threat of tariffs among the hurdles to a meaningful recovery. Germany's battered chemical industry holds its breath ahead of general election Germany is set to head to the polls on 23 February amid one of the most challenging economic scenarios the country has faced in post-war times. EU gas price cap proposals would drive shipments to other regions – ICIS expert Proposals under consideration in the European Commission to temporarily cap natural gas pricing would likely result in the diversion of supplies away from Europe and tighten supply in the region, an ICIS analyst said on Wednesday. EU promises plan to save chemicals as Clean Industrial Deal approaches The European Commission has promised to address the plight of the region’s energy-intensive petrochemical sector later this year as it gears up for the publication of the Clean Industrial Deal on 26 February. IPEX: Asia finding a floor, up 1%; PVC and PP drive 1.3% index fall in Europe; USG toluene firms The ICIS Petrochemical Index (IPEX) for January shows that northeast Asian chemical markets may be finding a floor after two consecutive months of declines, with the regional index up 1% – only its second gain in six months, driven by a 14.7% surge in butadiene due to rising crude oil costs.

17-Feb-2025

Correction: In the ICIS story headlined “INSIGHT: US tariffs unleash higher costs to nation's chem industry” dated 3 February 2025, the wrong volumes were used for the following imports: Canadian ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of less than 0.94; Canadian polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms; Canadian polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms; Canadian polypropylene, in primary forms; Canadian mixed xylene isomers; Mexican polypropylene, in primary forms; and Mexican cyclohexane. The US did not import cyclohexane from Mexico in 2023. A corrected story follows. HOUSTON (ICIS)–The tariffs that the US will impose on all imports from Canada, Mexico and China will unleash higher costs for the nation's chemical industry, create supply-chain snarls and open it to retaliation. For Canada, the US will impose 10% tariffs on imports of energy and 25% tariffs on all other imports. For Mexico, the US imposed 25% tariffs on all imports but the countries' presidents said on Monday the tariffs are being paused for a month. For China, the US will impose 10% tariffs on all imports. US IMPORTS LARGE AMOUNTS OF PE FROM CANADAUS petrochemical production is concentrated along its Gulf Coast, which is far from many of its manufacturing hubs in the northeastern and midwestern parts of the country. As a result, individual states import large amounts of polyethylene (PE) from Canada – even though the nation as a whole has a large surplus of the material. Even Texas imports large amounts of PE from Canada – despite its abundance of plants that produce the polymer. In addition, polyester plants in North and South Carolina import large amounts of the feedstocks monoethylene glycol (MEG) and purified terephthalic acid (PTA) from Canada. The US as a whole imports significant amounts of polypropylene (PP) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) from Canada – again, despite its surplus of these plastics. The following table lists some of the main plastics and chemicals that the US imported from Canada in 2023. The products are organized by their harmonized tariff schedule (HTS) code. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 3901.40.00 Ethylene-alpha-olefin copolymers, having a specific gravity of less than 0.94 kilograms 1,319,817,405 3901.20.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms kilograms 1,088,071,523 3901.10.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms kilograms 420,561,390 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts kilograms 407,710,439 2905.31.00 Ethylene Glycol kilograms 329,542,378 3902.10.00 Polypropylene, in primary forms kilograms 271,201,880 3904.10.00 Polyvinyl chloride, not mixed with any other substances, in primary forms kilograms 188,800,413 2902.44.00 Mixed xylene isomers liters 746,072 2905.12.00 Propan-1-ol (Propyl alcohol) and Propan-2-ol (isopropyl alcohol) kilograms 87,805,095 3901.30.60 Ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers kilograms 71,372,396 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) IMPORTS FROM MEXICOMexico is not as large of a source of US petrochemical imports as Canada, but shipments from the country are still noteworthy. The following table lists some of the main plastics and chemicals that the US imported from Mexico in 2023. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 2917.36.00 Terephthalic acid and its salts kilograms 69,230,708 3901.10.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of less than 0.94, in primary forms kilograms 34,674,435 2915.24.00 Acetic anhydride kilograms 25,294,318 3904.10.00 Polyvinyl chloride, not mixed with any other substances, in primary forms kilograms 24,005,371 2915.31.00 Ethyl acetate kilograms 18,855,544 3901.20.50 Polyethylene having a specific gravity of 0.94 or more, in primary forms kilograms 14,469,582 3902.10.00 Polypropylene, in primary forms kilograms 8,849,478 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) IMPORTS FROM CHINAChina remains a significant source for a couple of noteworthy chemicals despite the effects of the tariffs that US President Donald Trump imposed during his first term in office. The following table shows 2023 US imports from China. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUMES 29152100 Acetic acid kilograms 21,095,566 39093100 Poly(methylene phenyl isocyanate) (crude MDI, polymeric MDI) kilograms 206,642,886 Source: US International Trade Commission (ITC) China's shipments of plastics goods are more significant. OIL TARIFFS WILL HIT US REFINERSCanada and Mexico are the largest sources of imported crude oil in the US, and the heavier grades from these countries complement the lighter grades that the US produces in abundance. Those imports help fill out refining units that process heavier crude fractions, such as hydrocrackers, cokers, base oil units and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units. Refiners cannot swap out heavier Canadian and Mexican grades with lighter US grades. Instead, they will need to pay the tariffs or find another supplier of heavier grades, possibly at a higher cost. The following table shows the largest sources of imported crude in 2023. Figures are listed in thousands of barrels/day. COUNTRY IMPORTS % Canada 3,885 59.9 Mexico 733 11.3 Saudi Arabia 349 5.4 Iraq 213 3.3 Colombia 202 3.1 Total US imports 6,489 Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA) US refiners could take another hit from higher catalyst costs. These are made from rare earth elements, and China remains a key source. TARIFFS TO RAISE COSTS FOR FERTILIZERCanada is the world's largest producer of potash, and it exports massive amounts to the US. It is unclear how the US could find another source. Russia and Belarus are the world's second and third largest potash producers. Together, the three accounted for 65.9% of global potash production in 2023, according to the Canadian government. Canada accounts for significant shares of other US imports of fertilizers. The following table lists some of Canada's fertilizer shipments to the US in 2023 and shows its share of total US imports. Figures are from 2023. HTS PRODUCT MEASUREMENT VOLUME % 31042000 Potassium chloride metric tonne 11850925 88.8 31023000 Ammonium nitrate, whether or not in aqueous solution metric tonne 295438 76.6 31024000 Mixtures of ammonium nitrate with calcium carbonate or other inorganic nonfertilizing substances metric tonne 29203 75.7 31055100 Mineral or chemical fertilizers, containing nitrates and phosphates metric tonne 1580 66.1 31022100 Ammonium sulfate metric tonne 947140 49.6 31052000 Mineral or chemical fertilizers, containing the three fertilizing elements nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium metric tonne 147850 41.4 Source: US ITC SUPPLY CHAIN SNARLSIf US companies choose to avoid the tariffs and seek other suppliers, they could be exposed to delays and supply chain constraints. Other companies outside of the petrochemical, plastic and fertilizer industries will also be seeking new suppliers. The scale of these disruptions could be significant because Canada, Mexico and China are the largest trading partners in the US. The following table lists the top 10 US trading partners in 2023 based on combined imports and exports. Country Total Exports ($) General Imports ($) TOTAL Mexico 322,742,472,406 475,215,965,697 797,958,438,103 Canada 354,355,997,349 418,618,659,183 772,974,656,532 China 147,777,767,493 426,885,009,750 574,662,777,243 Germany 76,697,761,127 159,272,068,221 235,969,829,348 Japan 75,683,130,214 147,238,042,342 222,921,172,556 South Korea 65,056,093,590 116,154,470,335 181,210,563,925 UK 74,315,228,810 64,217,031,774 138,532,260,584 Taiwan 39,956,725,574 87,767,403,487 127,724,129,061 Vietnam 9,842,922,146 114,426,076,081 124,268,998,227 Source: US ITC RETALIATIONUS petrochemical exports would be tempting targets for retaliation because of their magnitude and the global capacity glut. China, in particular, could impose tariffs on US chemical imports and offset the disruptions by increasing rates at under-utilized plants. So far, none announced plans to target chemicals on Sunday. Canada's plans to impose 25% tariffs on $30 billion in US goods does not include oil, refined products, chemicals or plastics. That batch of tariffs will take place on February 4. Canada will impose 25% tariffs on an additional $125 billion worth of US goods following a 21-day comment period, it said. The government did not highlight plastics or chemicals in this second batch of tariffs. Instead, it said the tariffs will cover passenger vehicles and trucks, including electric vehicles, steel and aluminium products, certain fruits and vegetables, aerospace products, beef, pork, dairy, trucks and buses, recreational vehicles and recreational boats. In a statement issued on Sunday, Mexico's president made no mention of retaliatory tariffs. Instead, she said she will provide more details about Mexico's response on Monday. China said it will start legal proceedings through the World Trade Organization (WTO) and take corresponding countermeasures. RATIONALE BEHIND THE TARIFFSThe US imposed the tariffs under the nation's International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president authority to take actions to address a severe national security threat. In a fact sheet, Trump cited illegal immigration and illicit drugs. Saturday's executive order is the first time that a US president imposed tariffs under IEEPA. Prior IEEPA actions lasted an average of nine years. They can be terminated by a vote in Congress. Insight article by Al Greenwood (Thumbnail shows containers, in which goods are commonly shipped. Image by Shutterstock)

03-Feb-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Abu Dhabi Chemicals Derivatives Co (TA’ZIZ) said on Monday it has awarded South Korea’s engineering firm Samsung E&A a $1.7 billion contract to build the first methanol plant in the UAE, which is slated to be completed in 2028. The plant, to be built in Al Ruwais Industrial City in western Abu Dhabi, will have a capacity of 1.8 million tonnes/year, TA’ZIZ said in a statement posted on the website of its parent firm Abu Dhabi National Oil Co (ADNOC). TA’ZIZ is a joint venture (JV) between ADNOC and sovereign wealth fund ADQ. Samsung A&E was formerly known as Samsung Engineering. “The [methanol] plant will enhance the UAE’s position as a leader in sustainable chemicals production and strengthen TA’ZIZ’s role in enabling ADNOC’s global ambition to lead the chemicals sector,” TA’ZIZ CEO Mashal Saoud Al Kindi said. The company said that the plant will be "powered by clean energy from the grid, making it one of the world’s most energy-efficient methanol plants". Set up in 2020 to develop industrial projects and diversify the economy away from oil in the UAE, TA'ZIZ is expected to produce 4.7 million tonnes/year of chemicals by 2028 in its initial phase, including methanol, low-carbon ammonia, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), ethylene dichloride (EDC), vinyl chloride monomer (VCM), and caustic soda. Several of these chemicals will be produced for the first time in the UAE. ADNOC is moving in the specialty chemical space as part of its growth. On 1 February, ADNOC announced that it is in talks with Austrian petrochemical firm OMV to acquire Canada's Nova Chemicals from Mubadala, another Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund. If the acquisition goes through, a new global polyolefins group combining Nova Chemicals, Borealis, and Borouge will be formed, it said. Borealis is a 75:25 joint venture between OMV and ADNOC, while Borouge is jointly owned by ADNOC (54%) and Borealis (36%).

03-Feb-2025

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Here are the top stories from ICIS News Asia and the Middle East for the week ended 31 January. Inflationary pressure continues to dampen Asia recycling demand By Arianne Perez 27-Jan-25 09:53 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Annual inflation rates posted in December 2024 across major Asian markets were mostly showing gains month on month, keeping demand for recycled plastics sluggish. Asia petrochemical trades wane; Trump’s tariff threat weighs on Feb outlook By Jonathan Yee 27-Jan-25 11:11 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Trades in Asia’s petrochemical markets have slowed down ahead of the Lunar New Year holiday, with a general oversupply in the region and the threat of US tariffs clouding the outlook in February. China industries contract in January; official PMI falls to 49.1 By Nurluqman Suratman 27-Jan-25 12:29 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–China's official manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) slipped back into contraction mode, with a January reading of 49.1, as factory activity wound down ahead of the eight-day Lunar New Year holiday, official data showed on Monday. Asia SBR, PBR trades stall amid uncertain demand, strong BD cost By Ai Teng Lim 28-Jan-25 11:29 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Spot imports discussions in Asia of various synthetic rubber grades are stalling, not just because of extensive holiday market closures, but also due to shaky downstream demand prospects and mounting feedstock butadiene (BD) cost pressures. Asia melamine outlook hinges on post-Lunar New Year cost, demand support By Joy Foo 28-Jan-25 14:48 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–China’s melamine market stabilized from mid-January, driven by bullish signals in China's urea market. This put a pause to a broad downtrend in the melamine market that began in H2 October 2024. India PVC prices at two-year low; market eyes government spending boost By Aswin Kondapally 29-Jan-25 15:34 MUMBAI (ICIS)–India's polyvinyl chloride (PVC) prices plunged to a more than two-year low in the second half of January, owing to sluggish demand along with uncertainty over the exact timeline for the implementation of antidumping duties (ADDs). Asia naphtha demand to find support from Q1 cracker start-ups By Li Peng Seng 31-Jan-25 12:28 SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Asia’s naphtha demand will be supported post-Lunar New Year as new crackers starting up in China would temporarily mitigate concerns about impending trade wars exacerbating weak petrochemical margins.

03-Feb-2025