Xylenes

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Recently released data from the 2024 Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) Global Commitment report shows brands continue to make progress against their sustainability goals, albeit at a much slower pace than required. The Global Commitment was initiated in 2018, where both private and public entities joined as signatories, agreeing to work towards several packaging sustainability goals including virgin plastic reduction, increased use of post-consumer recycled (PCR) content, elimination of problematic packaging, increased design for circularity among packaging portfolios and increased application of reuse models across packaging and products. Of the 140 signatories who contributed to the most recent report, 91 are packaged goods companies, packaging producers, or retailers, who account for roughly 20% of the world's plastic packaging. While these unified goals have demonstrated a positive model for collaboration and voluntary action, this latest report underscores the necessity of additional global policy to unify all packaging players towards a circular economy. At present, signatories are largely outperforming the remaining 80% of the market when it comes to positive sustainable actions. As with all complex problems, it requires multiple solutions. As stated in the report, "Regulation will not solve everything, given the highly complex nature of plastic and packaging waste. Voluntary business action will continue to play a crucial role in innovating, showing what’s possible, and creating demand for solutions". According to the 2023 packaging volume data, the weighted average of PCR content has increased to 14% from 12% in 2022. This is still far from the weighted average goal of 26% across the signatories by 2025. In total, these efforts amount to over 2.5 million metric tons of PCR having been produced and used in packaging in 2023, up from roughly 2.3 million metric tons in 2023. This is in comparison to the potential demand for over 4 million metric tons of PCR if signatories were to reach their goals based on 2023 total plastic volumes. Looking at the past several years of progress, PCR growth has seen steady 2% increases year on year, though unfortunately this pace is far behind what is needed to reach the ambitious 2025 deadline. At this pace, signatories would collectively reach their goals in 2029, which feels particularly poignant as many individual companies have shifted their timelines from 2025 to 2030 amid growing bottom line pressure and lack of progress. The report confirms as much, transparently stating that many signatories are likely to miss key 2025 targets. That being said, progress is varied among players, with some much closer or already having surpassed initial PCR goals. Per the report, cosmetic sector signatories lead with 31% PCR use on average in 2023, while food sector signatories are only at 10% on average. This could be due to the mixed regulation across the globe regarding food contact approval, as well as the different margin implications between food packaging and other consumer goods items. Even if companies do miss their goals, EMF notes that the Global Commitment has fundamentally transformed data reporting and industry definition practices, a success in itself. According to the report, 45% of signatories now utilize third-party data verification measures which further support data transparency and accountability. When looking at the progress across the other main goals of the Global Commitment, virgin plastic volumes have decreased as companies make targeted efforts to reduce their footprint, though this can also be attributed lower product volumes being produced and sold in the midst of a weak macroeconomic environment as well as carry over destocking from 2023. Unfortunately, only 32% of signatories with a virgin plastic reduction target have either achieved or are on track to meet their target. Bear in mind, these reports publish at a delay and thus actions towards progress in 2024 have largely already taken place, or in some unfortunate cases, have not. This comes as the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) wraps up the fifth and last Intergovernmental Negotiation Committee (INC-5) at the end of the month, with the hopes of having a global treaty on plastic pollution by the end of the year. It remains to be seen how signatories will pursue a final push towards these goals in 2025, amid an uncertain regulatory and economic global environment. Additional reporting by Corbin Olson

19-Nov-2024

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–South Korean refiner S-Oil's new petrochemical complex in Ulsan is now 42% complete as of end-October and is on track for completion in 2026. Shaheen accounts for about 87% of full-year 2024 capex Project progress slightly ahead of schedule S-Oil swung to Q3 net loss on poor refining, petrochemical margins Construction of the $7bn project called Shaheen – Arabic word for falcon – at the Onsan Industrial Complex of Ulsan City started in March 2023. Its mechanical completion is targeted by the first half of 2026. Total capital expenditure (capex) for the Shaheen project is projected at W2,716 billion ($1.95 billion) in 2024, up 85% year on year, and accounts for about 87% of S-Oil's overall capex this year. The company’s full-year capex at W3,136 billion, which includes costs of upgrade and maintenance works as well as marketing-related expenses, represents a 54% increase from 2023 levels. The Shaheen project will have a 1.8m tonne/year mixed-feed cracking facility; an 880,000 tonne/year linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) unit; and a 440,000 tonne/year high density polyethylene (HDPE) plant. The site will have a thermal crude-to-chemical (TC2C) facility, which will convert crude directly into petrochemical feedstocks such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and naphtha, and the cracker is expected to recycle waste heat for power generation in the refinery. Saudi Aramco, the world’s biggest crude exporter, owns more than 63% of S-Oil. The project update was included in S-Oil’s presentation slides on its Q3 financial results released on 4 November. The company swung to a Q3 net loss of W206 billion amid a sharp decline in refining and petrochemical earnings. in South Korean won (W) billion Q3 2024 Q3 2023 % Change Jan-Sept 2024 Jan-Sept 2023 % Change Revenue 8,841 9,000 -1.8 27,720 25,897 7.0 Operating income -415 859 200 1,411 -85.8 Net income -206 545 -61 788 The petrochemicals unit of S-OIL posted an operating income of W5.0 billion in the third quarter, an 89% year-on-year drop. Paraxylene (PX) and benzene markets weakened in Q3 due to increased supply amid reduced gasoline blending demand and restarts of production facilities after turnarounds. The company's PX spread to naphtha weakened to $271/tonne in Q3 from $425/tonne in the same period last year, while the benzene-naphtha spread rose to $315/tonne from $251/tonne in the same period a year earlier. In the downstream olefin market, polypropylene (PP) was bearish in the third quarter due to "abundant regional supply amid weak downstream demand". The refining unit posted an operating loss of W573.7 billion in the third quarter, swinging from the W666.2 billion profit in the same period a year earlier. The loss in the refining segment was mostly due to the one-off impact from the decline in oil prices and foreign exchange rates. On market conditions, the company said that the supply-demand environment and margins for refiners in Asia is expected to "gradually improve due to reduced operating rate from low margin condition and heavier maintenances year over year, amid continued stockpiling if winter heating oil". For Q4, the company expected the PX and benzene markets to be supported by fresh demand from new downstream capacities while gasoline demand stays slow. For downstream olefin markets, S-Oil said that PP and propylene oxide (PO) markets may show modest recovery "depending on the impact of China's economic stimulus measures amid ongoing capacity additions". Focus article by Nurluqman Suratman ($1 = W1,395)

18-Nov-2024

With growing occurence of negative prices amid renewable penetration, more battery storage capacity will be needed Wide intra-day spreads to remain top revenue option for BESS, but margins can tighten as more capacity comes online Cross-markets optimization, battery degradation among key challenges for operators LONDON (ICIS)–Batteries can help mitigate negative wholesale power prices and wide intraday spreads but there is currently not enough capacity installed to eliminate them, Pierre Lebon, director of analytics at cQuant.io, told ICIS in an interview. Nevertheless, as new battery energy storage system (BESS) capacity comes online, it is likely that the occurrence of negative power prices will decrease, the expert noted. ICIS Analytics showed increased flexibility will be crucial in the long-run to improving solar capture prices, though expansion of battery and electrolyser capacity will remain far below the level of renewable expansion in the next few years. The latest ICIS analytics models predict 63.3GW battery storage capacity for EU countries by 2035. The European resource adequacy assessment, ENTSO-E's annual assessment of the risks to EU security of electricity supply for up to 10 years ahead, showed Germany would be a leader in battery capacity growth across the bloc, while outside EU, the UK has the highest available capacity. It is difficult to identify an optimal ratio of renewable capacity to BESS, as many factors must be taken into account and the supply balance will ultimately depend on each country’s generation mix and demand profile, as well as variable weather conditions. As of September, the number of hours with negative prices in Germany more than doubled to 373 compared to 166 in 2023.  These could have been mitigated by an adequate battery storage capacity, in turn reining in some price spikes in times of lower renewable supply. DURATION The vast majority of battery systems in Europe are currently two- to four-hour batteries and “that's mostly for economic reasons,” Lebon said. “If you have a four-hour battery, if you divide the power by two, you get an eight-hour battery. So you can change the duration if you change the capacity, it then becomes a matter of financial optimization,” he explained. There are currently new technologies such as iron salt battery (ISB) – also known as iron redox flow  battery (IRFB) – which can allow to build battery storage plants with a duration of up to 12-24 hours, however Lebon noted that, while the market is already looking into these technologies, they are still in early development. This seems confirmed by calculations from ICIS based on ERAA data, showing short (one hour) and medium (four hour) duration batteries will remain the preferred technology for the coming years.   REVENUES OPTIONS Operators don't necessarily need to have a negative power price to have a profitable battery, since BESS make money on the spread between the lowest price of the day or based on the duration that they can capture, Lebon explained. “It [negative power prices] adds the extra cherry on top of the cake, which is that you get paid to actually charge the battery,” he said. In markets with a strong ‘duck-shaped’ intra-day curve, the battery operators “can see a lot of value in intra-day trading” and less so on the ancillary services markets, Lebon added. Ancillary services like frequency regulation, voltage control, reserves and black start capabilities are needed to maintain power grids stability and guarantee an uninterrupted supply of electricity. Lebon noted that while battery operators typically consider the potential revenue from both intraday power markets and ancillary services, the stability of the revenue structures associated with the ancillary markets is often questioned. This is because transmission system operators (TSOs) and regulators tend to frequently change the rules and conditions of these markets. While cross-markets optimization – operating both on intraday and ancillary markets to maximize revenue sources – is possible, technical constraints or the legal paperwork needed to access ancillary markets can lead some operators to prioritize only one of these depending on the company’s structure and resources, the expert noted. INVESTING NOW? Penetration of batteries into European markets can reduce intra-day spreads, tightening margins for battery operators. Experts have previously told ICIS that early investors could benefit more from current wide power prices spreads than waiting for cheaper technologies. “The longer it takes for that technology to come in, the more likely it is that this technology will come [online] at a time where the spreads are crushed [by more battery storage capacity being installed],” Lebon added. BATTERY DEGRADATION The degradation of current lithium-ion utility-scale battery systems depends on several factors, including technology, number of cycles and temperatures. ICIS understands the typical yearly degradation can range between 2-5% and plants lifespan between 10-20 years, as reported in the lifetime warranty provided by some producers. A study by the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory indicated 15 years as the median lifespan based on several published values. Degradation is a key challenge in the optimization of battery assets, Lebon noted, adding that operators need to ensure their cycles strategy is compatible with manufacturers’ instructions and warranty.

07-Nov-2024

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Oil and gas production, the main source of the feedstock and energy used by the petrochemical industry, should benefit from policies proposed by President-Elect Donald Trump, while hydrogen and renewable fuels could lose some of the support they receive from the federal government. Trump expressed enthusiastic and consistent support for oil and gas production during his campaign. He pledged to remove what he called the electric vehicle (EV) mandate of his predecessor, President Joe Biden. Trump may attempt to eliminate green energy subsidies in Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) BRIGHTER SENTIMENT ON ENERGYRegardless of who holds the presidency, US oil and gas production has grown because much of it has taken place on the private lands of the Permian basin. Private land is free from federal restrictions and moratoria on leases. That said, the federal government could indirectly restrict energy production, and statements from the president could sour the sentiment in the industry. During his term, US President Joe Biden antagonized the industry by accusing it of price gouging, halting new permits for LNG permits and revoking the permit for the Keystone XL oil pipeline on his first day in office. By contrast, Trump has pledged to remove federal impediments to the industry, such as permits, taxes, leases and restrictions on drilling. WHY ENERGY POLICY MATTERSPrices for plastics and chemicals tend to rise and fall with those for oil. For US producers, feedstock costs for ethylene tend to rise and fall with those for natural gas. Also, most of the feedstock used by chemical producers comes from oil and gas production. Policies that encourage energy production should lower costs for chemical plants. RETREAT FROM RENEWABLES, EVsTrump has pledged to reverse many of the sustainability policies made by Biden. Just as Trump did in his first term, he would withdraw from the Paris Agreement. For electric vehicles (EVs), Trump said he would "cancel the electric vehicle mandate and cut costly and burdensome regulations". He said he would end the following policies: The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) recent tailpipe rule, which gradually restricts emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from light vehicles. The Department of Transportation's (DoT) Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) program, which mandates fuel-efficiency standards. These became stricter in 2024. The EPA was expected to decide if California can adopt its Advanced Clean Car II (ACC II) program, which would phase out the sale of combustion-based vehicles by 2035. If the EPA grants California's request, that would trigger similar programs in several other states. Given Trump's opposition to government restrictions on combustion-based automobiles, the EPA would likely reject California's proposal under his presidency or attempt to reverse it if approved before Biden leaves office. According to the Tax Foundation, Trump would try to eliminate the green energy subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). These included tax credits for renewable diesel, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), blue hydrogen, green hydrogen and carbon capture and storage. In regards to the UN plastic treaty, it is unclear if the US would ratify it, regardless of Trump's position. The treaty could include a cap on plastic production, and such a provision would sink the treaty's chances of passing the US Senate. For renewable plastics, much of the support from the government involves research and development (R&D), so it did little to foster industrial scale production. WHY EVs AND RENEWABLES MATTERPolicies that promote the adoption of EVs would increase demand for materials used to build the vehicles and their batteries. Companies are developing polymers that can meet the heat and electrical challenges of EVs while reducing their weight. Heat management fluids made from base oils could help control the temperature of EV batteries and other components. If such EV policies reduce demand for combustion-based vehicles, then that could threaten margins for refineries. These produce benzene, toluene and xylenes (BTX) in catalytic reformers and propylene in fluid catalytic crackers (FCCs). Lower demand for combustion-based vehicles would also reduce the need for lubricating oil for engines, which would decrease demand for some groups of base oils. Polices that promote renewable power could help companies meet internal sustainability goals and increase demand for epoxy resins used in wind turbines and materials used in solar panels, such as ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyvinyl butyral (PVB). Insight article by Al Greenwood Thumbnail shows the White House. Image by Lucky-photographer.

07-Nov-2024

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Donald Trump's re-election as US president sets the stage for economic turbulence in Asia as regional businesses brace for significant increases in US tariffs. Trump set to impose levies of 60% or more on Chinese goods US tariffs on China to accelerate economic decoupling China must counteract fallout from potential US trade protectionism Asian financial markets opened mixed on Thursday as investors assessed Trump's return to the White House after winning the 5 November US presidential election, with focus turning to the potential long-term impact of his economic and foreign policies. The other prominent victory for the Republican Party was re-taking of the US Senate, with the possibility of retaining control of the House of Representatives as well, which would give Trump unified control of the government. At 02:40 GMT, Japan’s Nikkei 225 slipped 0.39% to 39,335.52, South Korean benchmark KOSPI composite was 0.21% lower at 2,558.25 and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index edged 0.48% higher to 20,635.64. China’s mainland CSI 300 index was up 0.38% at 4,038.85. Chinese energy major PetroChina was up 0.52% in Hong Kong, LG Chem was down 3.11% in Seoul and Mitsui Chemicals rose 1.78% in Tokyo. POTENTIAL TARIFFS Trump has pledged to impose blanket tariffs of up to 20% on imports from all countries, with even steeper levies of 60% or more on Chinese goods, citing unfair trade practices that have contributed to US economic decline. China is expected to remain the primary target of additional US tariff measures due to its significant trade surplus with the US. The US has also become the top target of China’s anti-dumping cases for chemical imports, underscoring growing trade barriers between the world's two biggest economies. While China will likely retaliate against new trade policies, its response will likely be measured to avoid escalating tensions. “Trump has the legal authority to implement tariffs without Congressional approval, and we expect trade restrictions will be imposed quickly,” Japan’s Nomura Global Markets Research said in a note on Thursday. According to Nomura's forecasts, 60% tariffs on Chinese imports are likely to take effect by mid-2025. Additionally, a blanket 10% tariff may be imposed on all countries next year, although Canada and Mexico are expected to be exempt due to existing free-trade agreements. “The most pronounced impact on Asia will likely be through Trump’s policy on trade,” UOB Global Economics & Markets Research economists said in a note on Thursday. “It remains to be seen when and whether Trump will be able to carry through his tariff threats in their entirety.” Higher US tariffs on Chinese imports would likely speed up the economic separation of the world's two largest economies and significantly disrupt supply chains across Asia, according to analysts. Imposing new tariffs also increases the risk of China taking retaliatory measures, potentially jeopardizing crucial collaborations on pressing global issues like climate change and artificial intelligence (AI). “US-China relations are already frosty, and trade tariffs (if implemented) may exacerbate the situation," Singapore-based bank OCBC said in a note. “However, Trump is also a negotiator and may be inclined to cut a deal if he gets what he wants. Hence, the question is whether there will be a deal. The strategic industries most at risk remain advanced manufacturing, especially semiconductors, EVs [electric vehicles], solar panels etc.” In 2023, US imports from China hit a 14-year low of $427 billion, equivalent to 2.4% of China's nominal GDP. Since 2021, trade tariffs on China have been ratified and extended under US President Joe Biden. As a result, China lost its status as the US’ main trade partner for goods. The proportion of Chinese imports to the US fell significantly in the past two years from almost 19% at the start of 2022 to only 13.5% at the end of 2023, according to ratings firm Moody's. The proposed 60% tariffs on Chinese goods would substantially impact China's growth, effectively cutting off US demand for a large portion of Chinese imports. "Given the structural slowdown in its economy, China needs to offset the negative impact from any potential new trade protectionist measures with stronger domestic policy responses in order to stabilize growth,” UOB said. SPOTLIGHT ON CHINA'S NEXT MOVES The ongoing National People's Congress Standing Committee meeting on 4-8 November is under intense scrutiny as market observers await announcements on China's fiscal policy support. Key decisions expected include an additional yuan (CNY) 6 trillion ($836 billion) bond issuance to address hidden local government debts and CNY1 trillion for bank recapitalization. The upcoming Politburo meeting in early December and the Central Economic Work Conference (CEWC) will outline China's economic agenda for 2025. These gatherings will set the stage for the National People's Congress (NPC) in March 2025, where pivotal economic targets will be unveiled, including GDP growth, fiscal deficit, and local government special bonds issuance quota. These announcements will provide crucial guidance on China's economic direction for the year ahead. While China is a primary focus, other regions including ASEAN are also exposed to potential policy risks due to their significantly increased trade surpluses with the US since 2018. This surge is largely attributed to supply chain diversification aimed at evading tariffs and trade restrictions implemented during Trump's first term. "In ASEAN, there continues to be positive spillovers from the supply chain shifts leading to a brighter trade outlook this year while import demand strengthened across key Asian countries amid improving job market and domestic policy support,” UOB said. Asian exports will face more scrutiny, there will more regulatory headaches, but the region’s scale, excellence in manufacturing and logistics, strong corporate and public sector balance sheets will hold them in good stead during Trump 2.0, Singapore-based bank DBS said in note. With more Chinese companies offshoring export-focused production to southeast Asia, a second Trump administration may start to target these countries for trade-related violations, risk and strategic consulting firm Control Risks said. "One area to watch would be southeast Asia's automotive sector, where Chinese players are flooding and dominating the original equipment manufacturer industry as the region gears up to fulfil ambitions of being a hub for the production, assembly and export of electric vehicles in the coming decade." “Tariffs are an unambiguous negative for the region, but Asia’s strong ties with the US and China would survive Trump," DBS said. “The region’s openness to trade and commerce makes it more attractive to investors, especially as the contrast with an inward-looking West becomes stark. This election marks a firm rightward shift of the US; Asia has to learn to live with it.” Insight article by Nurluqman Suratman ($1 = CNY7.18) Thumbnail image: At Lianyungang port in China on 25 October 2024.(Costfoto/NurPhoto/Shutterstock)

07-Nov-2024

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Several ICIS market experts share insightful facts related to their respective plastics markets, amid conversations with industry professionals at PackExpo '24. Though each market comes with a host of uncertainties, the broader US plastic packaging industry continues to navigate mixed demand and various supply challenges in 2024 and beyond. Bottled beverage sector made up 15% of all US packaging revenue in 2023. US polyethylene terephthalate (PET) production to remain 3 billion lb short of domestic demand in 2025. US polystyrene (PS) production has been impacted by outages since July 2024. US polypropylene (PP) prices have been volatile, with price movements 11 out of the last 12 months. US polyethylene (PE) inventories are the highest they have been since May 2023. US recycled PET (R-PET) market facing onslaught of imports. 2Q2024 PET scrap import volumes were above 125 million lb. PackExpo runs through 7 November and is hosted in Chicago, Illinois.

06-Nov-2024

LONDON (ICIS)–UK-headquartered recycler Viridor intends to close its Avonmouth mechanical recycling facility following a strategic review, the company announced in a press release on Tuesday. The Avonmouth facility has a nameplate capacity of 80,000 tonnes/year of recycled polymers output concentrated on recycled polyolefins. Viridor is conducting a separate review of its Rochester mechanical recycling plant. The company attributed the decision to challenging market conditions, along with an absence of planned UK legislation to increase UK recycling rates. The company also cited low cost imports entering Europe and displacing domestic supply, echoing comments made by Plastics Recyclers Europe (PRE) on 24 October. "If circular plastics are to thrive in Europe, then plant closures are damaging to that progress. However, Viridor has been restructuring over a period of time including selling their waste business. While this is a refocus for Viridor, it leaves the UK market with reduced supply of recycled polymers," said Helen McGeough, global analyst lead, plastics recycling, ICIS. Across both recycled polyethylene (R-PE) and recycled polypropylene (R-PP) players in recent weeks, recycled flake and pellet producers have complained of negative margins in non-packaging grades. While packaging demand in Europe has remained firmer than non-packaging across 2024 to date, and new packaging projects continue to onboard in Q4, there has been increasing bearishness in the sector since October as players focus on core business due to strained macroeconomic conditions. Viridor said it will continue to invest in polymer recycling through its Quantafuel subsidiary – which is focused on pyrolysis-based chemical recycling. ICIS assesses more than 100 grades throughout the recycled plastic value chain globally – from waste bales through to pellets. This includes recycled polyethylene (R-PE), recycled PET (R-PET), R-PP, mixed plastic waste and pyrolysis oil. On 1 October ICIS launched a recycled polyolefins agglomerate price range as part of the Mixed Plastic Waste and Pyrolysis Oil (Europe) pricing service. For more information on ICIS’ recycled plastic products, please contact the ICIS recycling team at recycling@icis.com Thumbnail photo: Sorting at a plastics recycling facility (Source: Shutterstock)

05-Nov-2024

HOUSTON (ICIS)–Celanese plans to cut its quarterly dividend by 95% in Q1 2025 and idle plants in every region after third-quarter adjusted earnings fell well below guidance, the US-based acetyls and engineered materials producer said on Monday. Q3 adjusted earnings/share were $2.44 versus an earlier guidance of $2.75-3.00. Celanese shares were down by more than 13% in afterhours trading. Celanese is taking the following steps to cut down debt: It will temporarily idle plants in every region to reduce manufacturing costs through the end of 2024 It expects to generate an expected $200 million inventory release in the fourth quarter. The idling includes 10 sites in the company's Engineered Materials segment. In the first half of the fourth quarter, Celanese has temporarily idled the company's Singapore production of acetic acid, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), esters and vinyl acetate emulsions (VAE). In Frankfurt, Germany, the company is idling its VAM plant and plans to use it as swing capacity to meet demand. It will start a program to reduce costs by more than $75 million by the end of 2025. The cost cutting will target selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses. It will target $400 million in 2025 capital expenditures, a figure below 2024 levels. It will close on a 364-day delayed draw prepayable term loan for up to $1 billion. It will draw on the term loan in Q1 2025 towards $1.3 billion in maturing debt. TOUGH THIRD QUARTERThe plant shutdowns, dividend reduction and cost cutting follow a third quarter that saw demand degrade rapidly and acutely in automobiles and industrial end markets. "Auto in Europe and North America experienced a shock to the demand patterns that had been relatively steady for the previous several quarters, with swift sales declines in both regions that led to a pullback in auto builds," said Scott Richardson, chief operating officer. Demand remained slow in Asia but did not show the same trajectory as the Americas. The company noted that prices in China for undifferentiated nylon polymer reflects supply that is growing faster than demand. Demand remained weak in paints, coatings and construction. New capacity for VAM came online and outpaced demand, amplifying the weakness in construction as well as in solar panels. Excess inventories in solar panels is weakening demand for ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA). The weakness more than offset the gains that Celanese made from its synergy projects in its Mobility and Materials (M&M) acquisition and from its acetic acid expansion project in Clear Lake, Texas. WORSE FOURTH QUARTERQ4 destocking in the automotive and industrial end markets should be heavier than normal, and Celanese expects demand to worsen in the fourth quarter. The destocking should be temporary and contained in the quarter. In Engineered Materials, Celanese expects a $40 million hit from the destocking. Another $15 million hit will come from seasonal declines associated with product mix. A further $15 million will come from temporarily idling capacity in the segment. For acetyls, Celanese is not seeing any indications of demand growth in anticipation of the first quarter or as a result of stimulus from China. For the company, Q4 adjusted earnings/share should be $1.25. Q3 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEThe following table shows the company's Q3 financial performance. Figures are in millions of dollars. Q3 24 Q3 23 % Change Sales 2,648 2,723 -2.8% Cost of sales 2,026 2,050 -1.2% Gross profit 622 673 -7.6% Net income 116 951 -87.8% Source: Celanese Earnings in Q3 2023 reflect a $503 million one-time gain from the sale of assets. Thumbnail shows adhesive, which is made with VAM. Image by Shutterstock.

04-Nov-2024

SINGAPORE (ICIS)–Oversupply and higher freight costs are driving down petrochemicals demand in India, with trades likely to remain subdued after the Diwali holidays. Prolonged monsoon season hurt pre-Diwali demand Seasonal demand lull begins mid-November US election worries weigh on Indian rupee Demand traditionally picks up post-Diwali but a prolonged monsoon season, coupled with ample inventories, has led to a lack of import demand which is unlikely to change for the rest of the year. India was on holiday on 31 October to 1 November for Diwali or the Hindu festival of lights. Sentiment among market players was mixed, with some hopeful that post-holiday demand will pick up in certain products like polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ahead of implementation of import certification deadline under the Bureau of Indian Standards on 24 December. Demand lull typically sets in after the holiday, particularly for the pharmaceutical and manufacturing sectors, until end-November, when operations are ramped up in preparation for the summer holidays – between May and August. Overall production in the south Asian country typically increases along with demand in the January-March period – India’s fiscal Q4. For isopropanol (IPA), India’s import demand will be dented by antidumping duties (ADDs) imposed on Chinese cargoes. In the ethanolamines and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) markets, domestic supplies remains ample, with post-Diwali demand likely to remain soft. India is a major importer of Chinese petrochemicals. It has been adopting protectionist measures against Chinese exports amid an oversupply in the world’s second-largest economy, whose own domestic demand is weak. US ELECTIONS A CONCERN India's economy is slowing down, causing the rupee (Rs) to depreciate, with petrochemical import discussions scant amid ample inventories. A weaker currency makes imports expensive. The rupee plummeted to a near-record low of Rs84.075 against the US dollar on 31 October, partly on uncertainties over the US elections results. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had intervened to limit the rupee’s fall, selling US dollars to stem the loss and allowing it to climb back from a record low of Rs83.79, according to newswire agency Reuters. At 05:08 GMT, the rupee was trading at Rs84.03 against the US dollar. There are concerns that intra-Asian exports by China would increase on the possibility of further US punitive tariffs on Chinese products if Donald Trump was elected a second time as US president. His administration in 2017-2021 kicked off the US-China trade war in 2018. Trump is running under the Republican ticket against Democrat Kamala Harris in the US elections, which will be held on 5 November 2024. Focus article by Jonathan Yee Additional reporting by Veena Pathare, Clive Ong, Angeline Soh, Aswin Kondapally, Hwee Hwee Tan and Pearl Bantillo

04-Nov-2024

LONDON (ICIS)—The UK government will support the use of mass balance for chemical recycling under the UK plastic packaging tax using a fuel-exempt accounting approach at site-level, it published in a consultation response late on Wednesday. The original consultation on “Plastic Packaging Tax – chemical recycling and adoption of a mass balance approach” was conducted from 18 July-10 October 2023. “Chemical recycling can complement the use of mechanical recycling technologies by enabling more types of plastic to be recycled and by producing a higher grade of recycled plastic, which can be used in regulated sectors such as food contact packaging. Chemical recycling therefore has the potential to help increase rates of plastic recycling,” the UK government said in its consultation response. As part of the consultation response, the government also announced that it will phase out the use of pre-consumer material as contributing towards recycled content thresholds in tax calculations. Under the UK Plastic Packaging tax, any packaging which is predominantly plastic by weight, and that does not contain at least 30% recycled material is subject to a charge of £217.85/tonne on the total weight of the packaging. When the tax was introduced, both chemical and mechanical recycling were accepted as contributing toward the target, but there was no decision on the acceptance of mass balance. In mass-balance, a certified volume of renewable or recycled material is input across a production run but may not be evenly distributed across each individual product. For example, a plant may use 30% recycled material overall, but one piece of produced packaging could contain 100% recycled material, and the next 100% virgin material, or any mix between those two extremes. Via this method, market players are able to state that they use a certain percentage of recycled or renewable material in their products, without having to prove that percentage in each individual product produced. Mass-balance is widely used in a number of industries and is not exclusive to either mechanical or chemical recycling. There have been different proposed accounting rules for mass-balance, all of which alter the possible recycled polymer output allocations, and therefore profitability throughout the chain, pyrolysis oil’s competitive position against mechanical recycling, and the sector’s attractiveness to investors. Under fuel exempt mass balance accounting rules, volumes used in fuel applications would not be attributable as recycled material, but material not ending up in fuels would be freely attributable across the value chain. Given that pyrolysis oil  – the dominant form of chemical recycling in Europe – is used as a naphtha substitute in a cracker, many see acceptance of mass-balance as an essential enabler for chemical recycling to count towards recycling content thresholds. The UK government will not adopt definitions of chemical recycling under ISO standard 15270:2008, arguing that definitions of chemical recycling must be process and technology neutral. “The government intends to introduce a definition of chemical recycling in line with the proposed definition by the European Coalition for Chemical Recycling, for the purpose of the tax. This will enable businesses to use a mass balance approach to account for recycled material produced from any technology or process that meets the definition of chemical recycling,” the government stated. The government also said that differing units of measurement may be used at different parts of the supply chain. For example, mass being used at polymer and packaging level, and a Lower Heating Value approach used at refinery level. The government further stated that accredited certification schemes will be necessary to audit and certify the mass balance volumes, and it intends to accredit multiple certification schemes. The government also signaled that while it is not currently making changes to medical exemptions under the tax at present it intends to remove this exemption once more chemically recycled plastic is available. “Producers and importers of medical packaging are encouraged to start considering how to include more recycled plastic in their packaging as chemical recycling capacity, feedstock levels, recyclate availability increase, and advancements in technology are developed,” it stated. There was no timeframe announced for when these changes would take place. Clarity on the UKs approach to mass balance will be welcomed by the market. Despite structural tightness of pyrolysis oil in Europe, buying interest in 2024 to date has been lower than that seen in 2023 largely due to ongoing legal uncertainty over approaches to mass balance accounting.  Legal uncertainty was one of the factors cited by Quantafuel in August for the cancellation of its 100,000 tonne/year pyrolysis-based chemical recycling project in Sunderland. On 16 July the British Plastics Federation (BPF) submitted a joint letter it had coordinated to the incoming Exchequer Secretary James Murray MP, calling for an urgent response to the previous government’s mass balance consultation. ICIS covers 3 grades of pyrolysis oil in its Mixed Plastic Waste and Pyrolysis Oil Europe pricing service . ICIS also offers mechanical recycling, waste bale, biodiesel, hydrogen, and virgin price coverage, giving you the complete picture across the sustainability value chain. For more information, please contact Mark Victory at mark.victory@icis.com.

30-Oct-2024