
News library
Subscribe to our full range of breaking news and analysis
Commodity group
Region
Date
Viewing 21-30 results of 58721
Power08-Aug-2025
Germany’s 2.5GW offshore wind auction
failed to attract any bids
Market participants believe this failure
could jeopardise Germany’s target of 30GW
offshore wind by 2030
Industry urges government to reform auction
design with support of two-way CFDs
LONDON (ICIS)– For the first time, a German
offshore wind tender failed to attract any
bids. Now market participants are warning this
could lead to reduced volumes in future
offshore wind tenders, potentially impacting
capacity targets for 2030.
On 6 August, the German Federal Network Agency
(BNetzA) announced no bids were received for
two of its offshore wind sites in the North
Sea, totalling 2.5GW of capacity.
The tender was for the investigated areas of
N-10.1 and N-10.2, with volumes of 2,000MW and
500MW and planned commissioning dates of 2031
and 2030, respectively.
THREAT FOR FUTURE OFFSHORE WIND CAPACITY
One German power trader told ICIS that as a
result of the failed auction, volumes for
future offshore wind tenders could possibly be
reduced.
A German power analyst shared a similar view,
noting that the outcome could help prompt a
revision of Germany’s 2030 offshore targets to
be lowered in this year’s energy monitoring
report, expected at the end of August 2025.
“I assume there will be a reduction in
capacity. Nevertheless, a timely revision is
needed in order to achieve even lower targets,”
the analyst said.
ICIS long-term power analytics currently
projects installed German offshore wind
capacity to reach 25GW by 2030, 5GW short of
the 2030 national target.
The same analyst explained that lower offshore
wind targets would generally have a pronounced
bullish impact on the far end of the curve, but
added that a downward correction of projected
electricity demand for 2030 would almost
neutralise the effect.
A
weak industrial demand and slow growth in
e-mobility and heat pumps could potentially
deteriorate demand forecasts for the coming
years.
On 7 August, ICIS assessed the German Baseload
Cal ’27, Cal ’28 and Cal ’29 power contracts at
€80.975/MWh, €73.100/MWh and €71.275/MWh,
respectively.
CALLS FOR AUCTION DESIGN REFORM
In a response to request for information,
BNetzA told ICIS it had “no information on
motivations that caused potential bidders to
refrain from submitting bids,” while the German
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and
Energy (BMWE) stated it was reviewing the
outcome and would engage with stakeholders.
Although no official reasons have been given, a
spokesperson from the German Federal
Association for Offshore Wind Energy (BWO) told
ICIS that key factors included: excessive risk
exposure from permitting uncertainty, rising
costs and grid delays, the absence of a revenue
stabilization mechanism like Contracts for
Difference (CFDs), and misalignment between
tender schedule and long lead times of offshore
projects.
“The postponed auction is, of course, a
disaster for offshore wind power, but it can
still be seen as a predictable failure,” said
the German power analyst.
The same analyst acknowledged that economic
factors and technical issues in the tender
areas likely contributed to the auction
results, but highlighted that the auction
design might have played a more significant
part, noting “the UK has shown that potential
investors are ready to step in if the auction
system is right.”
Nonetheless, the same source noted CFDs also
have problems and should not be viewed as a
sole solution.
Germany’s offshore wind tenders currently use a
negative bidding model, while the UK uses
two-way CFDs – a model which offshore industry
experts have
previously said would help de-risk projects
and provide a reliable revenue stream for
offshore wind in Germany.
Although the UK has seen some success for
offshore wind in CFD auctions, with 3.4GW
awarded to new offshore wind projects in the
most recent auction held in 2024, the UK
has
introduced reforms to the scheme ahead of
the seventh auction round.
On the same day of the announcement, lobby
groups such as Wind Europe and the BWO urged
the German government to reform its auction
design, stressing the need for a reliable CFD
system.
Denmark, which similarly failed to attract bids
for its 3GW offshore wind tender in December
2024 and also used negative bidding model,
recently announced it would
re-tender the capacity using two-way CFDs.
Speciality Chemicals08-Aug-2025
BARCELONA (ICIS)–Rising overcapacity, AI and
protectionism may drive a swift transition in
chemical production and markets over the next
5-10 years.
Commodity chemicals may be produced mainly
by large state-owned enterprises
Smaller, privately-owned companies may
switch to high value composites, specialties,
low-carbon chemicals
High-cost regions such as Europe could
protect their essential commodity chemicals
production
Protective measures need to be taken in
next 3-6 months to rescue EU commodity
chemicals
A lot more commodity capacity closures
required to keep operating rates healthy
AI will have a massive impact on chemical
companies and markets
AI will enable us to navigate and analyze
increasingly chaotic markets
AI could drive job losses, disrupt
economies
Climate change will alter seasonal and
geographic demand patterns
Electronics, property, auto markets are
depressed
Q2 chemicals results are very poor in all
regions
In this Think Tank podcast, Will
Beacham interviews John
Richardson from the ICIS market
development team, ICIS Insight Editor
Tom Brown and Paul
Hodges, chairman of New Normal
Consulting.
Editor’s note: This podcast is an opinion
piece. The views expressed are those of the
presenter and interviewees, and do not
necessarily represent those of ICIS.
ICIS is organising regular updates to help
the industry understand current market trends.
Register here .
Read the latest issue of ICIS
Chemical Business.
Read Paul Hodges and John Richardson’s
ICIS
blogs.
Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate08-Aug-2025
LONDON (ICIS)–Senior Editor for Recycling Matt
Tudball discusses the latest developments in
the European recycled polyethylene
terephthalate (R-PET) market, including:
Drops in FD NWE bale, flake and food-grade
pellet prices
Eastern Europe colourless, blue flake down
UK flake rolls over while southern Europe
discussions delayed due to holidays

Global News + ICIS Chemical Business (ICB)
See the full picture, with unlimited access to ICIS chemicals news across all markets and regions, plus ICB, the industry-leading magazine for the chemicals industry.
Crude Oil08-Aug-2025
SINGAPORE (ICIS)–LG Chem swung to a
second-quarter net loss year on year to won (W)
112 billion ($80.8 million), amid soft demand
caused by US tariffs and Middle East
instability, the South Korean producer said on
7 August.
in Korean won (W)
billion
Q2 2025
Q2 2024
% Change
Sales
11,418
12,242
-6.7
Operating profit
477
392
21.5
EBITDA
1,715
1,549
10.7
Net income
-112
60
–
Sales in LG Chem’s petrochemicals division fell
5.7% year on year to W4.7 trillion in the
second quarter, while recording an operating
loss of W90.4 billion amid buying hesitation
and “unfavorable foreign-exchange effects”, the
company said.
“In the third quarter, the company aims to
improve profitability through the normalization
of new capacity additions for key products in
North America and Asia and ongoing
cost‑reduction initiatives,” said LG Chem in a
statement.
Overall demand is expected to remain “subdued”
in the third quarter despite US tariff
uncertainties having been resolved, as a 15%
tariff on South Korean exports takes effect.
LG Energy Solution’s Q2 operating profit turned
positive to W492 billion, driven by an improved
product mix from increased North American
production and cost reduction efforts.
LG Chem holds a controlling 81.8% stake in LG
Energy Solution, the leading car battery maker
in the country that supplies to electric
vehicle majors such as Tesla.
($1= W1,387)
Caustic Soda07-Aug-2025
HOUSTON (ICIS)–The 2025 Atlantic hurricane
season is likely to be above normal, but
slightly less so than its initial prediction,
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) said on Thursday in an
update to its previous forecast.
NOAA still anticipates 13-18 named storms, of
which 5-9 will become hurricanes, and 2-5 of
those will be major storms, as shown in the
following graphic.
Source: NOAA
NOAA’s forecast in May was for 13-19 named
storms, 6-10 hurricanes and 3-5 major
hurricanes. The likelihood of above-normal
activity is 50%, a 35% chance of a near-normal
season, and a 15% chance of a below-normal
season.
“As the 2025 Atlantic Hurricane Season enters
its historical peak, atmospheric and oceanic
conditions continue to favor an above-normal
season as NOAA first predicted in May,” NOAA
said.
The adjustments are for the entire season,
which runs through 30 November, and include the
four named storms that have already formed.
Yesterday, researchers at Colorado State
University’s (CSU) Weather and Climate Research
department also maintained their
prediction, with slight adjustments to the
downside.
Hurricanes directly affect the chemical
industry because plants and refineries shut
down in preparation for the storms, and they
sometimes remain down because of damage.
Power outages can last for days or weeks.
Hurricanes shut down ports, railroads and
highways, which can prevent operating plants
from receiving feedstock or shipping out
products.
Most US petrochemical plants and refineries are
on the Gulf Coast states of Texas and
Louisiana, making them prone to hurricanes.
Other plants and refineries are scattered
farther east in the states of Mississippi,
Alabama, and Florida – a peninsula that is also
a hub for phosphate production and fertilizer
logistics.
There is currently one named storm in the north
Atlantic, Dexter, and two low pressure areas,
none of which are expected to make landfall.
Ethylene07-Aug-2025
LONDON (ICIS)–Business sentiment in Germany’s
chemical industry “significantly deteriorated”
in July, from June, according to the latest
survey by Munich-based research group ifo on
Thursday.
The weak industrial economy was weighing on
demand for chemical products, both in Germany
and abroad, ifo said.
At the same time, the US
tariffs on chemicals and pharmaceuticals
were “significantly damaging” German companies’
US business, ifo said.
The backlog of orders in the chemical industry
is now at its lowest level since the financial
crisis in 2009, ifo said.
Meanwhile, companies were planning further job
cuts, the group said.
The ifo Business Climate Index for the chemical
industry dropped to -19.2 points in July, from
-9.5 in June.
COMPANIES LOWER SALES
OUTLOOKS
Also on Thursday, Henkel and SGL Carbon
announced that they lowered the outlooks for
2025 sales.
Henkel now expects organic sales growth of
1.0-2.0%, down from its previous outlook of
1.5-3.5% growth.
The updated outlook took into account, “the
currently foreseeable effects of the global
tariff agreements at this point in time and
broadly correlates with current market
expectations for Henkel’s business development
over the course of the year”, said CEO Carsten
Knobel.
Henkel’s 2024 sales were €21.6 billion.
SGL Carbon said that it expects full-year 2025
sales to decline by 10-15%, from 2024 sales of
€1.026 billion. SGL’s previous outlook was for
a 10% decline.
“Increasing trade barriers, especially due to
US tariff policy, are having a negative impact
on the business development of our customers
and sales markets,” SGL said.
German chemical producers’ trade group VCI
expects a 2.0% decline in the country’s
chemical production (excluding pharmaceuticals)
in 2025.
Please also visit:
US
tariffs, policy – impact on chemicals and
energy
Ethylene07-Aug-2025
HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US is relying increasingly
on tariffs to influence the policies of other
countries, which is injecting more uncertainty
into chemical markets.
The US is proposing tariffs of 25% on
shipments from India in response to that
country’s imports of Russian oil and
petroleum products. These could take effect
on 27 August.
The US imposed tariffs of 40% on Brazilian
imports in response to that country’s trial of
a former president and its policies on digital
speech. More tariffs could follow a section 301
investigation into Brazilian policies.
The US said Canada’s intent to recognize
Palestine as a state would make it
difficult to reach a trade deal.
POLITICAL TARIFFS INJECT MORE
UNCERTAINTYThe latest proposals
accelerate a trend that began at the start of
the year, when the US imposed tariffs on
imports from Canada, China and Mexico after
accusing them of doing too little to
control illegal immigration and drug smuggling.
The US threatened to impose tariffs of 25%
on imports from Colombia if that country did
not accept US deportations of immigrants.
The debate around a dedicated Palestinian state
and the Russian-Ukrainian war have now joined
the list of policies that will invite tariffs
from the US.
In the case of Russian oil, the US is imposing
tariffs to compel a peace agreement. India was
caught in the crossfire because it imports
crude oil from Russia.
More countries could become targets because the
US is targeting Russian exports of petroleum
products as well as crude oil. Russia is a
significant exporter of diesel and gasoil, and
Turkey, China and Brazil import large amounts
from the country,
according to the Centre for Research on Energy
and Clean Air (CREA).
It is unclear if the US will expand the tariffs
to include other major exports from Russia,
such as weapons and fertilizer.
The US threat to Canada could presage potential
tariffs on imports from other countries that
are considering Palestinian statehood.
The tariffs on Brazilian imports and the
pending section 301 investigation point to
more policies that could attract the ire of the
US. The following lists the policies the US
cited in its announcements of Brazilian tariffs
and investigations:
Regulations on digital speech that the US
considers to be censorship
Judicial trials against elected officials
that the US considers to be political
persecution
Imposing what the US described as lower
preferential tariffs on imports from “certain
globally competitive trade partners”
Failure to enforce anti-corruption and
transparency measures
Enforcement of intellectual property rights
Deforestation
TRADE UNCERTAINTY HAMMERED CHEM
EARNINGSThe problem is not the
merit of US aims but the methods it is using to
achieve those goals. Sudden changes in trade
policy make it difficult for companies to
forecast demand and trade flows.
During the recent earnings season, chemical
companies said the uncertainty surrounding US
trade policy has discouraged businesses and
consumers from making purchases and business
decisions.
Dow said that US exports of polyethylene
(PE) evaporated in April after the US announced
its reciprocal tariff rates.
Westlake,
Tronox,
LyondellBasell,
Huntsman,
Eastman and
Arkema all mentioned uncertainty
surrounding US tariffs and trade policies.
Political tariffs are injecting more
uncertainty into markets, because chemical
companies do not know which countries and which
policies will trigger tariffs from the US.
TRADE UNCERTAINTY TO
CONTINUEUS trade policy remains
in flux.
It is delaying its proposed tariffs
on Mexican imports for 90 days.
The legal basis of the most of the national
tariffs
is being challenged in court. If the US
loses the case, then it could be forced to
rescind the national tariffs that it imposed
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (IEEPA). These cover the
reciprocal tariffs, the immigration tariffs,
the drug-smuggling tariffs, the Russian oil
tariffs and the Brazilian tariffs.
Meanwhile, the US is continuing a separate
track of imposing tariffs on product families
under Section 232. These would prove more
durable because they are not subject to the
litigation.
These tariffs are proceeded by a lengthy
investigation, but that does not insulate the
process from surprises.
When the US announced its investigation into
copper, markets assumed that it would be
followed by tariffs on refined copper. Instead,
the US imposed 50% tariffs on imports of
semi-finished copper products and intensive
copper derivative products.
However,
the US could expand the tariffs to include
other copper products. After 30 June, the
president could consider universal tariffs on
refined copper that would start at 15% on 1
January 2027 and rise to 30% on 1 January 2028.
The following table summarizes the pending
section 232 investigations and the deadlines to
complete them.
Product
Start of investigation
Report Due
Timber, lumber
10-Mar
5-Dec
Semiconductors
1-Apr
27-Dec
Pharmaceuticals
1-Apr
27-Dec
Medium duty trucks
22-Apr
17-Jan
Heavy duty trucks
22-Apr
17-Jan
Critical minerals
22-Apr
17-Jan
Commercial aircraft
1-May
26-Jan
Jet engines
1-May
26-Jan
Polysilicon
1-Jul
28-Mar
Unmanned aircraft systems
1-Jul
28-Mar
Source: Bureau
of Industry and Security
The US has also broadened and increased tariffs
on previously completed investigations, as
shown in the following table.
Product
Tariff
Automobiles
25%
Auto parts
25%
Steel
50%
Aluminium
50%
Copper
50%
Source: President
These tariffs have exceptions based on the
country of origin and their portion of
domestically produced content.
Insight by Al Greenwood
Caustic Soda06-Aug-2025
HOUSTON (ICIS)–Researchers at Colorado State
University’s (CSU) Weather and Climate Research
department maintained their prediction of an
above-average Atlantic hurricane season as the
tropical Atlantic has warmed faster than normal
over the past few weeks.
The CSU team’s original prediction of 17 named
storms during the Atlantic hurricane season,
which began on 1 June and runs through 30
November, has been adjusted to 16 named storms.
Of those 16 storms, researchers forecast eight
to become hurricanes and three to reach major
hurricane strength of Category 3 or higher.
The original forecast called for nine storms to
reach hurricane strength and four of those to
be Category 3 storms or higher.
The adjusted forecast includes the three storms
that have already formed: Andrea, Barry and
Chantal.
Hurricanes are rated using the Saffir-Simpson
Hurricane Wind Scale, numbered from 1 to 5,
based on a hurricane’s maximum sustained wind
speeds, with a Category 5 storm being the
strongest.
Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind
Scale
Category
Wind speed
1
74-95 miles/hour
2
96-110 miles/hour
3
111-129 miles/hour
4
130-156 miles/hour
5
157+ miles/hour
“So far, the 2025 hurricane season is
exhibiting characteristics similar to 2001,
2008, 2011 and 2021,” Phil Klotzbach, a senior
research scientist in the Department of
Atmospheric Science at CSU and lead author of
the report, said. “Our analog seasons generally
had somewhat above-average Atlantic hurricane
activity.”
The team bases its forecasts on two statistical
models, as well as four models that simulate
recent history and predictions of the state of
the atmosphere during the coming hurricane
season.
CSU researchers listed the following
probabilities of major hurricanes making
landfall in 2025:
48% for the entire US coastline (average
from 1880–2020 is 43%).
25% for the US East Coast, including the
Florida peninsula (average from 1880–2020 is
21%).
31% for the Gulf Coast from the Florida
panhandle westward to Brownsville, Texas
(average from 1880–2020 is 27%).
53% for the Caribbean (average from
1880–2020 is 47%).
Hurricanes directly affect the chemical
industry because plants and refineries shut
down in preparation for the storms, and they
sometimes remain down because of damage.
Power outages can last for days or weeks.
Hurricanes shut down ports, railroads and
highways, which can prevent operating plants
from receiving feedstock or shipping out
products.
Most US petrochemical plants and refineries are
on the Gulf Coast states of Texas and
Louisiana, making them prone to hurricanes.
Other plants and refineries are scattered
farther east in the states of Mississippi,
Alabama, and Florida – a peninsula that is also
a hub for phosphate production and fertilizer
logistics.
Ethylene06-Aug-2025
HOUSTON (ICIS)–The US plans to impose an
additional tariff of 25% on shipments from
Indian in response to that country’s imports of
Russian crude oil and petroleum products, the
government said on Wednesday.
The US is considering similar tariffs on
imports from other countries that import
Russian crude oil or petroleum products.
The additional tariffs on Indian imports will
take effect on 27 August, and they would raise
the duty on Indian imports to 50%
once the earlier tariffs are included, the
government said.
The US is using the tariffs as part of a
strategy to compel Russia to reach an agreement
with Ukraine over those countries’ war between
each other. The US alleges that Indian imports
of Russian oil are undermining its diplomacy
and sustaining Russia’s war effort.
The proposed tariffs would not apply to the
sectoral tariffs that the US has imposed on
product families such as steel and aluminium
under section 232.
The US could modify the duties if India imposes
retaliatory tariffs, if India addresses US
concerns over petroleum imports or if Russia
addresses US concerns over the war.
The US made no mention of Russian shipments of
fertilizer. Such shipments are significant, and
their exclusion indicates that the US may not
target them as part of its efforts to end the
war.
In a statement, India alleged that the proposed
tariffs are unfair, unjustified and
unreasonable.
“We have already made clear our position on
these issues, including the fact that our
imports are based on market factors and done
with the overall objective of ensuring the
energy security of 1.4 billion people of
India,” the country’s Ministry of External
Affairs said in a statement. “India will take
all actions necessary to protect its national
interests.”
The following summarizes other details of the
proposed tariffs on Indian imports.
It excludes many coal-based chemicals and
some polymers listed in Annex II, which was
published in April.
It covers Russian crude oil or “petroleum
products extracted, refined or exported from
the Russian Federation, regardless of the
nationality of the entity involved in the
production or sale of such crude oil or
petroleum products”.
It covers indirect imports, which “includes
purchasing Russian Federation oil through
intermediaries or third countries where the
origin of the oil can reasonably be traced to
Russia”.
The tariffs will take place “21 days after
the date of this order, except for goods that
(1) were loaded onto a vessel at the port of
loading and in transit on the final mode of
transit prior to entry into the US before 12:01
am eastern daylight time 21 days after the date
of this order; and (2) are entered for
consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption, before 12:01 am eastern daylight
time on 17 September 2025”.
Thumbnail image: Containers, which feature
prominently in international shipping (Image
source: Shutterstock)
Contact us
Partnering with ICIS unlocks a vision of a future you can trust and achieve. We leverage our unrivalled network of industry experts to deliver a comprehensive market view based on independent and reliable data, insight and analytics.
Contact us to learn how we can support you as you transact today and plan for tomorrow.
READ MORE
