APLA ’24: LatAm chems should prepare for rebalancing to take place only from 2030 onwards – APLA

CARTAGENA, Colombia (ICIS)–Latin American chemicals producers should be prepared to face a prolonged downturn which could extend to 2030 as newer capacities globally keep coming online, according to the director general at the Latin American Petrochemical and Chemical Association (APLA).

Manuel Diaz said global manufacturing is not recovering at the speed the chemicals industry would need for supply and demand to rebalance anytime soon, and Latin America – the quintessential ‘price taker’ region as its trade deficit makes it dependent on imports from other regions – must prepare for the most prolonged downturn in chemicals in living memory.

Diaz spoke to ICIS ahead of the APLA annual meeting which kicked off on Monday.

“This is pretty much what we are going to be talking about in the 2024 annual meeting: oversupply of products and raw materials, of ethylene. There are still many plants being announced, so it seems that at least until 2027, I would say 2030, the pressure on profitability is going to be very strong,” said Diaz.

“Companies in Latin America should be prepared because, while new plants are still being started up, there is no sign of a world recovery strong enough to get there. A silver lining could be found in the fact that there is still considerable population growth: from now until 2050, we will have a growth in the world population like what would be, so to speak, adding a new India [the most populous country with 1.45 billion people].”

Diaz, an Argentinian national, said he expects more plants will shut down in his home country as the national chemicals industry adapts to a more liberalized market under Javier Milei’s administration.

In October, US chemicals major Dow said it would stop producing polyether polyols at its site in San Lorenzo, in Argentina’s province of Santa Fe, on the back of poor economics caused by global oversupply, while Argentina’s Petroquimica Rio Tercero shut its toluene diisocyanate (TDI) plant in Cordoba arguing the same reason.

“I think we will see a reorganization in the sector, especially in Argentina. There will be some plants that are no longer sufficiently attractive from a profitable or product point of view – there will be a trend to concentrate on more profitable products,” said Diaz.

“In the case of Dow, for instance, the plant they shut in Argentina was not the only plant of that type that it shuts down globally, that is why I think this is not a problem only in Argentina or Brazil – it is a global problem, a problem of competitiveness.”

Diaz said we must think about China’s “differently” in order to understand the current downcycle, much of it related to that country’s overcapacities as its economy is not growing at the expected, pre-pandemic-like rates.

“From our place in the world, we see everything as an economic curve and a capital curve, but the Chinese sees it from the point of view of a work curve. So, it is not a case that they are subsidizing the product itself for an easier sale,” said Diaz.

“What they are doing, in my opinion, is subsidizing companies so job creation does not slow down – economic growth there is the priority.”

He went on to reflect on how the globalization rates up to 2020 may have gone too far, adding the pandemic showed us how it was a mistake to focus on just a few countries – or just China, in many cases – as the main source for manufactured goods.

– So, is the world coming back to a protectionist wave, like that of the 1930s?

– “Now we see countries around the world thinking about how to protect their manufacturing sectors from China’s oversupplies, so maybe that globalizing cycle [up to 2020] has ended, the trend of setting up plants in the cheapest place and so on. I think the pandemic left us messages,” said Diaz.

“Messages around the fact that we can’t have a dependency on a single place from where all the electronic chips come from, for instance. So, I think it’s not going to be just Brazil [where protectionist measures are enacted] but in many other Latin American countries – it is a contingency measure.”

Finally, about the potential the new US administration under Donald Trump may impose import tariffs on Mexico, Diaz said “reality may end up surpassing” ideology, referring to the high dependance US manufacturers also have from Mexico’s manufacturers.

The two countries’ economies became highly linked from the 1990s, when the first North American free trade deal, NAFTA, was signed. The situation did not change much after the first Donald Trump administration renegotiated NAFTA to give way to the current USMCA trade deal.

“We have two new administrations in the US and Mexico. We will see what they end up doing, but what is clear is that there will be alternatives [to import tariffs being imposed]. Trump also knows that US companies buy a lot from Mexico, and in a protectionist spiral Mexico could also impose tariffs, so US companies would end up being affected as well,” said Diaz.

“That is the reality that applies to everything, and that is why I say that reality normally surpasses your ideological vision: One thing is what I can say in the campaign, a different one may be what you implemented once you are in office.”

Thumbnail shows money from Latin America. Image by ICIS.

The 44th APLA annual meeting takes place 18-21 November in Cartagena, Colombia.

Interview article by Jonathan Lopez