![](https://cjp-rbi-icis.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2021/10/03104743/ICIS.News_.Hero_.block_.1922x634px.jpg)
News library
Subscribe to our full range of breaking news and analysis
Viewing 1-10 results of 56991
Speciality Chemicals02-Jul-2024
BARCELONA (ICIS)–Chemical companies can expect
to pay even more for container space along the
Asia to Europe route as attacks against
shipping persist, port congestion grows, and
demand rises.
Shipping rates soar amid congestion, rising
demand, echoing post-pandemic era
Shipping reliability, customer service
levels have fallen
Shippers reorganizing routes, focusing on
big ports like Singapore
Global container shipping capacity growing
by 20% year on year
Container fleet utilization over 90%
despite rising supply
End of Houthi Red Sea attacks would cause
freight rates to collapse
Demand rising for containers even though
industrial demand is flat
Huge investment in port, road, rail
infrastructure especially in Asia
Logistics problems leave oversupply trapped
in Asia
More trade barriers may protect regional
markets
In this Think Tank podcast, Will
Beacham interviews Thomas Cullen,
chief analyst at Transport Intelligence, ICIS
Business Solutions Group senior executive
Nigel Davis, ICIS senior
consultant Asia John
Richardson and Paul
Hodges, chairman of New Normal
Consulting.
Editor’s note: This podcast is an opinion
piece. The views expressed are those of the
presenter and interviewees, and do not
necessarily represent those of ICIS.
ICIS is organising regular updates to help
the industry understand current market trends.
Register here .
Read the latest issue of ICIS
Chemical Business.
Read Paul Hodges and John Richardson’s
ICIS
blogs.
Crude Oil02-Jul-2024
LONDON (ICIS)–Inflation in the eurozone
resumed its downward trend in June, falling to
2.5% from 2.6% in the previous month, according
to official data on Tuesday.
The rate of inflation has been ticking down
consistently over the past few months, with
the exception of May which saw a 0.2
percentage point increase from April.
June’s annual inflation was mainly driven by
services, followed by food, alcohol &
tobacco, non-energy industrial goods and
energy, statistics agency Eurostat said in its
flash estimate, which is subject to revision.
The European Central Bank (ECB) cut
its key interest rates for the first time
since 2019 on 6 June as inflationary pressures
broadly eased.
Gas02-Jul-2024
UPDATED:
On 27 June 2024, ICIS updated this analysis
to include a review of the impact that
manifesto pledges could have on UK power prices
On 24 June 2024, ICIS updated this
analysis to include a review of the renewable
capacity pledges from manifestos and their
likelihood of being met
On 21 June 2024, ICIS updated this
analysis to include a breakdown of the impact
of new gas licenses on British gas
supply
On 20 June 2024, ICIS updated this
analysis to include the Scottish National
Party’s manifesto plans for energy. The
manifesto table now includes these
details
Initial analysis published with detailed
table reviewing energy policies from
announced manifesto pledges, original
analyses covering nuclear power and gas-fired
power generation, a UK election special
episode of the ICIS Hydrogen Insights
podcast
LONDON (ICIS) — On 4 July 2024 the UK public
will elect a new government, but what do the
different parties have in store for energy? The
following analysis reflect core pledges from
manifestos and reviews those pledges in detail
using ICIS data and insights.
This analysis of UK political pledges and
announcements will be continuously updated by
the ICIS energy editorial team. Lead authors
include: UK power reporter Anna Coulson,
British gas reporter Matthew Farmer.
UK ELECTION PLEDGES UNLIKELY TO IMPACT POWER
PRICES
UK power prices out to 2030 could remain
relatively unchanged regardless of which party
wins the UK election
ICIS analytics forecasts UK power prices to
range between £46-85/MWh in 2030
LONDON (ICIS)–UK power prices could remain
relatively unchanged to 2030 regardless of
which political party wins in the UK’s general
election on 4 July, ICIS analysis shows.
The development of the power market and new
capacity faces continued hurdles, despite
numerous parties intending to rein in energy
prices according to their manifestos.
An analysis of the Conservative, Labour,
Liberal Democrat, Green Party, Reform UK,
Scottish National Party (SNP) and Plaid Cymru
manifestos shows that all parties present
different policies aimed at helping manage
energy bills.
Some policies presented by the main parties
suggest direct consumer initiatives, such as
Labour’s plan to issue grants and loans for
insulation, or the Green Party policy pledge to
develop an insulation scheme, or the SNP’s
financial relief for consumers in the Highlands
and Islands of Scotland.
However, some policies seek to address the
wholesale power market through measures such as
new licenses for gas-fired power generation or
the build-out of renewable capacity.
Renewables, volatility and risk
Broadly speaking, energy policies proposed by
UK parties present three different paths.
Firstly, there are policies focused primarily
on expanding renewable capacity as ageing
gas-fired and nuclear power plants are
decommissioned. Such policies would lead to
periods of lower power prices, but balancing
this would drive more volatility across
short-term power prices.
This pathway is most closely resembled by the
Green Party, which has ambitious targets for
renewable deployment by 2035.
As the party plans to phase out existing
nuclear power and stop the development of new
plants, this would increase price volatility as
nuclear would no longer operate as a baseload
source of generation. The Green Party’s
manifesto did not specify a timeline for the
nuclear plans; therefore, it is difficult to
determine when this could affect UK power
prices.
However, the party states it would rapidly
expand energy storage capacity, which would
balance renewable energy intermittency,
although more detailed plans are not specified
in the party’s manifesto.
The SNP also intends to develop renewable
energy, outlining “significant growth” in
renewables alongside expansion in storage for
energy.
The Liberal Democrats also lean towards
renewable development but present a
decentralized approach when considering solar.
The party would seek to build solar panels on
new homes, therefore reducing power demand for
residential offtake.
A more central approach can be seen from both
the Conservative and Labour parties, which both
present clear plans for renewable growth, but
also consider building new nuclear capacity or,
in the case of Labour, also extending the life
of the existing nuclear fleet.
Furthermore, the Labour party intends to
maintain a strategic reserve of gas-fired power
plant which could limit price volatility but
would result in higher power prices linked to
natural gas prices.
The Conservatives plan to build new gas power
stations which would also reduce price
volatility but would create an even stronger
link to gas prices. However, the party’s
manifesto did not state how much capacity would
be added and when, therefore it is hard to
determine when this could impact prices.
Finally, the third pathway is presented by
Reform UK, which presents plans to fast-track
small-modular reactor (SMR) build out for
nuclear capacity while reviewing the potential
for tidal power, both baseload
generation-supporting activities. Further, with
the party’s intention to explore new UK gas
field licenses, gas-fired power supply could
remain in the mix into the future.
ICIS analyst view
Despite multiple power market pledges, the
potential for manifesto points to translate
into price movements appears limited, according
to ICIS analyst Robbie Jackson-Stroud.
Jackson-Stroud notes that the development and
construction of new capacity, such as gas-fired
power plants, requires time to agree upon at a
policy level, plan and then construction.
Adding to this, “cost constraints in the
current climate are the driver of investment in
renewable capacity, and a change of party does
not shift that,” he added.
Regardless of the party to come out as winner
of the 4 July elections, there may simply not
be enough time to deploy new capacity for
wholesale power prices to ease, be that
renewables or fossil-fuel based generation.
Considering the challenges facing parties in
delivering power-market change ahead of 2030,
it is unlikely that they would present notable
shifts to forecasted power prices before the
next decade.
ICIS long-term power data indicates that in
2030, depending on the development of the
carbon price, UK power prices are expected to
range between £46-85/MWh.
In comparison, ICIS price assessments show that
the UK power front-month baseload price
averaged £66.62/MWh between January to June
this year, which is £49.34/MWh lower than the
same period last year.
The drop in price is due to more stable market
conditions this year in the UK and on the
continent.
UK PARTIES COULD STRUGGLE TO MEET RENEWABLE
CAPACITY ELECTION PLEDGES – Added to analysis
24 June 2024
UK parties unlikely to meet capacity
targets
Key to onshore wind would be change to
regulation
Offshore wind could struggle following
recent CfD round
LONDON (ICIS)–For the UK general election,
Labour, the Conservatives and the Green Party
are the only three of the main parties to
present outright capacity targets for renewable
energy deployment across their manifestos.
However, ICIS data and analyst insight suggests
that meeting such targets could face
difficulties due to recent setbacks in the UK’s
Contracts for Difference (CfD) bidding process
and restrictive regulation for onshore wind.
The Labour party manifesto states it will
double onshore wind, triple solar power, and
quadruple offshore wind by 2030. To present an
idea of this, ICIS has multiplied its
forecasted capacity for these technologies in
the UK by the end of 2024 by their respective
factors according to Labour’s pledges. Actual
intended capacity may vary. ICIS had contacted
the Labour party for comment but received no
response by the time of publication.
Onshore wind
Labour plans to double onshore wind capacity by
2030, while the Green Party would deploy 53GW
of capacity by 2035.
The Liberal Democrats would ‘remove the
Conservative’s unnecessary restrictions on new
wind power’, likely referring to the
requirements the current government introduced
in 2015 and changes to the law in 2016.
Planning policies were updated in September
2023 to allow locations suitable for new wind
farms to be identified in several ways, rather
than only in the area’s development plan.
However, decisions continue to be made by local
planning authorities which differs to the
process for other infrastructure projects where
decisions on major projects are made by the
Secretary of State.
The current government does not have an onshore
wind capacity target and the Conservative’s
manifesto has no mention of one however, it
does state that the party will ensure
democratic consent for onshore wind.
ICIS analytics forecasts 25.85GW of onshore
wind capacity in 2030 and in 2035, under a base
case scenario, which is below Labour and the
Green Party’s targets. ICIS analyst, Robbie
Jackson-Stroud, stated that planning permission
is one of the main challenges onshore wind
projects face.
“Costs for turbines have also risen and so they
are then squeezed into a CfD funding pot where
they have to compete with solar”, he added.
Jackson-Stroud noted that onshore wind could be
a key component to the development of renewable
capacity in the UK, changes to regulation
permitting.
“One aspect that is likely to change is
regulation and approval of onshore wind
projects, which require less budget and time to
build. However, it is difficult to envisage a
new government being timely enough to
sufficiently improve the approval process and
have enough projects apply to shift onshore
capacity before 2030. It should be noted,
however, how much potential a change to
regulation would have to long term capacities,
and you can expect more capacity in the 2030s”,
Jackson-Stroud said.
Offshore wind
The Conservatives, Labour and the Green party
all position offshore wind as a key technology
to support the decarbonization of the UK’s
power system. However, achieving such targets
appears difficult following an unsuccessful
fifth auction of the CfD scheme in 2023, in
which there were no bids for offshore wind amid
a low strike price.
The current government increased the strike
price for the upcoming sixth auction round,
raising the maximum strike price from £44/MWh
to £73/MWh.
Jackson-Stroud highlighted the difficulty
facing the next wave of auctions when
considering 2030 targets.
“Both parties [Labour and the Conservatives]
have pledged unachievable targets without a
huge budget increase for the CfD. Taking into
account the time it takes to build offshore
wind sites (that are getting increasingly
larger on average) there are only two CfD
auctions at most that can fund capacity to come
online by 2030.
“There is roughly 27GW of offshore wind already
under CfD, under construction or operational,
suggesting the need for a further 23GW across
two auctions, which would be a record at a time
where costs are higher than they have ever
been. While the budget for the latest round has
been raised to an all-time high of £800m for
offshore and £1.2bn total, this would still
procure only 12GW of wind in even the most
conservative estimates.
“This means regardless of Labour increasing
2030 targets for offshore, even the 50GW
already in place will not be met, and a change
of party doesn’t change the blockers to this,”
Jackson-Stroud said.
ICIS analytics forecasts that offshore wind
capacity will be 39GW in 2030 under a base case
scenario, therefore falling short of the
Conservative and Labour party targets.
Similarly, offshore wind capacity is forecast
to be 48.04GW in 2035 under a base case
scenario, well below the Green Party’s target.
Solar
Labour plan to triple solar capacity by 2030,
while the Green Party and Conservatives have
set targets for 2035, 100GW and 70GW
respectively based on manifesto and recent
policy announcements.
However, reaching such targets may prove
challenging based on recent CfD results. ICIS
analyst Matthew Jones
previously noted that for the UK to meet
its 70GW by 2035 target, CfD capacity awards
would need to average 4.5GW/year. However, over
the last two CfD rounds, just 2.2GW was awarded
in each.
Further, ICIS analytics forecasts 42.97GW of
solar capacity by 2030, and 48.54GW by 2035,
under a base case scenario, therefore missing
the Labour, Conservative and Green Party
targets.
Since the closure of the renewable obligation
and feed-in tariff schemes, the CfD scheme is
the only subsidized route to market for solar.
The forecast models cited in this
story are available as part of ICIS Power
Foresight. If you would like to learn more
about ICIS Power Foresight, please contact head
of power analytics Matthew Jones at
Matthew.Jones@icis.com
UKCS LICENSING – Added to analysis 21 June 2024
Several parties have committed to end the
issuing of new licenses for extraction of oil
and gas on the UK continental shelf (UKCS),
however ICIS analysis shows the inclusion of
new licenses may have a minimal impact in
mitigating output decline.
Gas production on the UKCS started declining in
2000, but held steady during the 2010s. It
currently accounts for approximately 40% of
Britain’s gas supply mix, with the bulk of
remaining volumes coming through Norwegian
imports and LNG. From the late 2020s, UKCS
production is expected to decline by
approximately 6% per year.
Licenses on new discoveries would not reverse
the decline in British production expected in
coming years. However, they would have
accounted for another 0.80 billion cubic meters
(bcm) of British gas production in 2030,
increasing to 1.5bcm in 2035.
In contrast to the other parties, the
Conservatives and Reform UK have committed to
annual licensing rounds and “fast-track”
licenses, respectively. Both have done so with
a justification of maintaining British energy
independence, citing the rising price of energy
caused by the full-scale Russian invasion of
Ukraine.
GAS-FIRED POWER DEMAND LIKELY UNMOVED
Both the Conservatives and the Labour party
show support for the continued use of gas for
power generation, bolstering a key area of
demand for British gas market participants.
However, of the two parties, the Conservatives
presented a more bullish mentality by noting
intensions for new gas plants,
aligning with previous announcements to
support new capacity.
Labour meanwhile take a muted approach, noting
the need for a strategic reserve of gas for
power generation.
Both Labour and the Conservatives have
therefore presented policy that could reduce
power-market price volatility as renewable
capacity grows, with gas offering baseload
generation at periods of low renewable output.
Gas demand for power to remain
From a gas-market perspective, the use of gas
for power amounts to a large share of overall
demand. In 2023, gas offtake for power
accounted for 26% of total gas demand.
The UK is heavily reliant on gas-fired power
generation, with it contributing 26% of the
UK’s electricity mix in the period 1 January to
31 May 2024, according to data from National
Grid.
Similarly, gas-fired generation provided an
average 36.3% of the mix over the 2019-23
period, therefore making a significant
contribution to the UK’s electricity stack.
While the capacity of new gas generation is not
mentioned in the Conservative party’s
manifesto, ICIS analytics forecast data
indicates that gas capacity is set to increase
through to 2026, under a base case scenario.
This would suggest that offtake for power
generation could well remain a key share of
overall gas demand under either a Conversative
or a Labour government.
Further, ICIS data shows that there will be
7.92GW of gas capacity in 2050 under a base
case scenario, which itself raises uncertainty
around the prospect of pledges to decarbonize
power grids by around the 2030s.
NUCLEAR
Nuclear power represented a large focus for the
Labour, Conservative and Reform UK parties,
which each announced plans to increase nuclear
capacity through a mix of measures, such as
plant life extensions, new large-scale
projects, or Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).
Despite this, the overall pledges presented for
the election suggests need for further capacity
build-out in the run up to 2050 in order to
meet the government’s target.
While the Conservative’s manifesto did not
mention a specific nuclear capacity target, the
current government has a target to reach 24GW
of nuclear capacity by 2050.
ICIS analytics forecasts that, under a base
case scenario, nuclear capacity will be 12.76GW
by 2050.
Plant life extensions
Although Labour’s manifesto did not provide
details on which nuclear plants it intended to
focus on for life extensions, or for how long,
the intension is in line with former market
announcements from EDF, which stated plans
in January 2024 to extend the lives of five
UK nuclear plants.
EDF plans to invest an additional £1.3bn in
these power stations over 2024-26, with the aim
to maintain output from the four advanced
gas-cooled reactors (AGR) for as long as
possible, and for the Sizewell B plant to
operate for an additional 20 years.
The lifetimes of the four AGR stations would be
reviewed by the end of 2024.
New capacity
From a new capacity perspective Labour pledged
to get the 3.2GW Hinkley Point C project over
the line and that new nuclear power stations,
such as the 3.2GW Sizewell C project, will play
a key role in helping the UK to achieve energy
security and clean power.
In January, the Conservatives announced
plans for a new large-scale nuclear power
plant, which would be as large as Hinkley Point
C or Sizewell C, which are both 3.2GW in
capacity.
The current government announced in May that
Wylfa would be the preferred site for this new
plant however, a commissioning date is still to
be confirmed. This aligns with the party’s
manifesto pledge to deliver a new gigawatt
power plant at the same location.
The new plant in Wales could well boost UK
nuclear capacity, but it would still present a
capacity gap between the current ICIS forecast
for 2050 and the government’s target of 24GW.
Small modular reactors
Labour, the Conservatives, and Reform UK all
mention SMRs in their manifestos however, the
Conservatives will approve two new fleets of
SMRs within the first 100 days of the next
parliament.
This is likely through the competitive process
that Great British Nuclear (GBN) launched in
2023 to select SMR technologies best placed to
be operational by the mid-2030s.
GBN plans to announce successful bidders for
the competition by the end of 2024 and to take
two SMR projects to a final investment decision
by 2029.
However, it must be noted that SMRs are a new
technology, and none are commissioned yet in
Europe.
HYDROGEN
In this UK general election special, ICIS
hydrogen editor speaks with Rob Dale, founder
and director of UK consultancy Beyond2050,
which aims at supporting market participants in
achieving their energy and sustainability
goals.
Over the course of the episode, Jake and Rob
review which parties have committed to hydrogen
for the election and what makes this election
the biggest for hydrogen so far.
![](https://cjp-rbi-icis.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2021/10/31125609/News.485x196.png)
Global News + ICIS Chemical Business (ICB)
See the full picture, with unlimited access to ICIS chemicals news across all markets and regions, plus ICB, the industry-leading magazine for the chemicals industry.
Caustic Soda01-Jul-2024
HOUSTON (ICIS)–Hurricane Beryl, already a
major Category 4 storm, is making its way
toward Mexico, but it remains too early to tell
where it will ultimately make landfall.
Beryl is now the earliest Category 4 storm on
record in the Atlantic. The previous earliest
was Hurricane Dennis on 8 July 2005.
The US National Hurricane Center (NHC) said as
of 1900 GMT Beryl was about 60 miles (100km)
west northwest of Carriacou Island with maximum
sustained winds of 150 miles/h and moving
west-northwest at 20 miles/h.
Source: National Hurricane Center
(NHC)
Late-cycle track guidance from the Tropical
Cyclone Guidance Project (TCGP) shows the
different tracks based on various models in the
image below.
Source: Tropical Cyclone Guidance Project
(TCGP)
If the storm continues to move to the west, it
could threaten Mexican facilities in Veracruz
state, which is in the south of the Bay of
Campeche.
Also in the region are the major port city of
Coatzacoalcos and Braskem Idesa’s integrated
polyethylene (PE) Ethylene XXI complex.
Beryl could also make landfall near Altamira,
which has been experiencing a drought and could
provide the area with much-needed rain but
could also impact operations at the multitude
of chemical facilities in the area.
Another scenario would be if the storm swings
to the north, which could threaten oil and gas
production in the US Gulf as well as Gulf Coast
petchem operations.
Beryl is expected to pass near Jamaica on
Wednesday but the storm is unlikely to affect
the chlor-alkali chain.
Jamaica is home to a number of large alumina
refineries that consume significant volumes of
US caustic soda, used to refine alumina from
bauxite, or aluminium ore.
ACTIVE HURRICANE SEASON
The early activity in the Atlantic Ocean is in
line with forecasts calling for a
busier-than-usual hurricane season.
The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) is predicting the
greatest number of hurricanes in the agency’s
history.
NOAA forecasters with the Climate Prediction
Center said that the hurricane season – which
started on 1 June and runs through 30 November
– has an 85% chance to be above normal, a 10%
chance of being near normal and only a 5%
chance of being below normal.
The prediction of 17-25 named storms is the
highest ever, topping the 14-23 predicted in
2010.
A storm is named once it has sustained winds of
39 miles/h.
Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind
Scale
Category
Wind speed
1
74-95 miles/h
2
96-110 miles/h
3
111-129 miles/h
4
130-156 miles/h
5
157+ miles/h
Damage from hurricanes can lead to
increased demand for chemicals, but hurricanes
and tropical storms can also disrupt the North
American petrochemical industry because many of
the nation’s plants and refineries are along
the US Gulf Coast in the states of Texas and
Louisiana.
In 2022, oil and natural gas production in the
Gulf of Mexico accounted for about 15% of total
US crude oil production and about 2% of total
US dry natural gas production, according to the
US Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Even the threat of a major storm can disrupt
oil and natural gas supplies because companies
often evacuate US Gulf platforms as a
precaution.
Additional reporting by Al Greenwood, Kelly
Coutu, Bill Bowen
Urea01-Jul-2024
HOUSTON (ICIS)–Sowings of corn and soybean
have concluded and there is now 11% of the corn
acreage silking with 20% of soybeans blooming,
according to the latest US Department of
Agriculture (USDA) weekly crop progress report.
The recent wet conditions followed then by
warmer-than-normal temperatures have helped
initially push crop development forward, with
the agency reporting 11% of corn has reached
the critical silking phase.
This current pace is ahead of the 7% achieved
in 2023 and the five-year average of 6%.
For corn conditions, there is currently 3% of
the crop listed as very poor with 6% as poor.
There is 24% of the crop considered fair, with
52% labeled as good and 15% as excellent.
For soybeans, there is 95% of the crop which
has emerged. This is less than the 97% from
2023 but it is higher than the five-year
average of 93%.
20% of the acreage has reached the blooming
phase, which equals the 2023 rate but is ahead
of the five-year average of 15%.
In the first update of soybeans setting pods,
the weekly report said there is 3% of the crop
at this stage, matching the 3% achieved last
year and easing just above the five-year
average of 2%.
For soybean conditions, there is 2% of the crop
seen as very poor with 6% listed as poor. There
remains 25% of the crop considered fair, with
55% counted as good and 12% as excellent.
For the other key crops, the USDA said cotton
plantings have reached 97% completed with
sorghum at 96%.
Speciality Chemicals01-Jul-2024
SAO PAULO (ICIS)–Here are some of the stories
from ICIS Latin America for the week ended on
28 June.
NEWS
Brazil Unigel falls short
of tolling deal for ammonia plants –
Petrobras
Petrobras has alleged that Unigel has failed to
meet the terms of their tolling agreement for
the production of ammonia at two idled plants,
the Brazilian state-controlled energy producer
said on Friday.
Brazil’s Cibra
inaugurates new plant in
Matopiba
Cibrafertil Companhia Brasileira de
Fertilizantes (Cibra) has inaugurated a
greenfield plant in Sao Luís, Maranhao, the
Brazilian fertilizer company has announced.
Saudi Arabia,
South America offer promising opportunities for
base oils
Markets such as Saudi Arabia and countries in
South America hold potential for growth in the
years ahead, industry sources said on Friday.
Mexico’s central
bank keeps rates unchanged at 11% as inflation
ticks up
The Banco de Mexico kept on Thursday the main
interest rate benchmark unchanged at 11% after
the annual rate of inflation has increased
since February.
Argentina GDP
down 5.1% in Q1 but sentiment rises again in
May
Argentina’s recession may have bottomed out in
the first quarter, with a GDP fall of 5.1% year
on year, as a leading indicator for economic
activity rose in May for the third month.
Plant status:
Chemours resumes TiO2 production at Mexico
plant
US producer Chemours has resumed operations at
its Altamira, Mexico titanium dioxide (TiO2)
facility after it was forced to reduce them due
to water shortages in the area.
PRICING
LatAm PE domestic
prices lower in Argentina on weak
demand
Domestic polyethylene (PE) prices were assessed
as lower in Argentina while being unchanged in
other Latin American countries.
Potassium Chloride (MOP)01-Jul-2024
HOUSTON (ICIS)–Australian BCI Minerals
announced it has signed a 21-year transhipment
services agreement with CSL Australia for its
Mardie salt and potash project in Western
Australia.
The producer said undertaking transhipment
operations at Mardie provides a cost-effective
alternative to a deep-water port as it
eliminates the need for towage and pilots and
is expected to perform well in the local
weather conditions.
As planned, the transhipper will travel 12-15
nautical miles from a jetty loadout facility to
fill ocean-going vessels with a deadweight of
up to 207,000 tonnes, which BCI said gives a
significant strategic advantage over regional
competitors, which cannot load vessels of this
size.
This agreement, valued at Australian dollars
(A$) 598 million ($398.7 million) will be
delivered in two phases, with the first portion
done under a 12-month time charter agreement
using an existing transhipment vessel.
At the same time, CSL will construct a new
vessel to use at Mardie, which is targeting
output of 5 million tonnes/year of salt and
140,000 tonnes/year of sulphate of potash
(SOP).
It is anticipated this new transhipment vessel
will be constructed in approximately 36 months.
BCI said phase two will begin upon
commissioning of their vessel and completion of
a 20-year services agreement which will contain
two five-year extension options.
“BCI Minerals is very pleased to sign this
major contract with CSL for a vessel
specifically designed for the Mardie salt and
potash project, which will provide us with a
secure and cost-effective shipping solution
providing real benefits to our operations and
our customers,” said David Boshoff, BCI
Minerals managing director.
“CSL’s market leading reputation for delivering
transhipment solutions and their commitment to
safety and reliability make them an ideal
long-term partner for BCI Minerals.”
$1 = A$1.50
Ethylene01-Jul-2024
RIO DE JANEIRO (ICIS)–US manufacturing
activity remained in contraction territory in
June but output in the chemicals sector was
healthy on the back of healthy new orders, the
Institute of Supply Management’s (ISM’s)
purchasing managers’ index (PMI) survey showed
on Monday.
The PMI stood at 48.5% in June, down from
48.7
points in May.
The contraction in June was the third
consecutive monthly one, and the 19th in the
last 20 months.
Chemicals, however, posted healthy activity
with one chemicals player reporting in the ISM
survey “high volumes of customer orders”.
In plastics and rubber, a respondent described
increased orders on the back of seasonal
restocking, but the sector overall remained in
contraction territory.
“Demand was weak again, output declined and
inputs stayed accommodative. Demand slowing was
reflected by the New Orders Index improving to
marginal contraction, New Export Orders Index
returning to contraction, Backlog of Orders
Index dropping into stronger contraction
territory and Customers’ Inventories Index
moving into the low side of the ‘just right’
range, neutral for future production,” said
Timothy R Fiore, chair of the ISM’s committee
compiling the PMI index.
“Output (measured by the Production and
Employment indexes) declined compared to May,
with a combined 3.5-percentage point downward
impact on the Manufacturing PMI calculation.
Panelists’ companies reduced production levels
month over month as head count reductions
continued in June.”
According to ISM, eight manufacturing
industries reported growth in June: printing
and related support activities; petroleum and
coal products; primary metals; furniture and
related products; paper products; chemical
products; miscellaneous manufacturing; and
nonmetallic mineral products.
Nine industries reported contraction: textile
mills; machinery; fabricated metal products;
wood products; transportation equipment;
plastics and rubber products; food, beverage
and tobacco products; electrical equipment,
appliances and components; and computer and
electronic Products.
ICIS VIEWKevin Swift,
economist at ICIS, highlighted how both new
orders and order backlogs fell compared with
May.
“The reading came below expectations of
improvement. The expansionary reading in March
ended 16 months of contraction in manufacturing
but since then, the trend has been soft. June
marks a third contractionary reading and was
disappointing… The chemical industry gained for
the sixth month after 16 months of decline.”
“New orders and order backlogs, when combined
with the reading on inventories, are good
indicators of future activity. Inventories
contracted at faster pace as well. An uptick in
orders could translate into higher production.”
Earlier on Monday, analysts at S&P Global
said manufacturing in Brazil – the Americas’
second largest economy – had recovered slightly from
floods-hit May, although some economic
challenges such as the depreciation of the
Brazilian real were putting a cap on growth
prospects, they added.
US MANUFACTURING
June 2024
Index
Series Index Jun
Series Index May
Percentage Point Change
Direction
Rate of Change
Trend* (Months)
Manufacturing PMI
48.5
48.7
-0.2
Contracting
Faster
3
New Orders
49.3
45.4
+3.9
Contracting
Slower
3
Production
48.5
50.2
-1.7
Contracting
From Growing
1
Employment
49.3
51.1
-1.8
Contracting
From Growing
1
Supplier Deliveries
49.8
48.9
+0.9
Faster
Slower
4
Inventories
45.4
47.9
-2.5
Contracting
Faster
17
Customers’ Inventories
47.4
48.3
-0.9
Too Low
Faster
7
Prices
52.1
57.0
-4.9
Increasing
Slower
6
Backlog of Orders
41.7
42.4
-0.7
Contracting
Faster
21
New Export Orders
48.8
50.6
-1.8
Contracting
From Growing
1
Imports
48.5
51.1
-2.6
Contracting
From Growing
1
Thumbnail shows an automobile manufacturing
line. Image by Anna
Szilagyi/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)
Ethylene01-Jul-2024
RIO DE JANEIRO (ICIS)–Sales growth in Brazil’s
manufacturing is being dented by challenging
economic conditions, currency depreciation and
order postponements after the floods crisis,
analysts at S&P Global said on Monday.
S&P Global’s manufacturing PMI Index for
Brazil recovered nearly half a percentage point
at 52.5 points, remaining in expansion
territory.
Any reading above 50.0 points shows expansion.
Brazil manufacturing
June
May
April
March
February
January
December 2023
November
October
September
August
July
PMI
index
52.5
52.1
55.9
53.6
54.1
52.8
48.4
49.4
48.6
49.0
50.1
47.8
Source: S&P Global
REAL DEPRECIATION
The Brazilian real has been weakening for
weeks, and it was already mentioned by the PMI
survey respondents as one key challenge they
faced in June, via higher prices for imports.
Crop losses resulting from the floods in the
southernmost state of Rio Grande do Sul added
to the issues.
As a result, inflation rates for both input
costs and output charges reached 23-month
highs.
“A sharper deterioration in suppliers’ delivery
times, which is inverted before entering the
PMI calculation, also boosted the headline
figure. The latest improvement in the health of
the sector was solid by historic standards,”
said S&P Global.
“Underlying data showed that backlog clearing
supported output growth in June, with some
firms also noting better demand for certain
goods. The rise in production was moderate, but
this represented an improvement from the
flood-related stagnation seen in May.”
Manufacturers also faced rising cost pressures
driven by real weakness and crop losses, with
prices for several items including coffee,
cotton, dairy, fabrics, oil, pulp, rice, steel,
wheat and zinc higher.
The overall inflation rate reached its highest
in nearly two years.
Factory gate charges similarly rose to the
greatest extent since mid-2022, as firms passed
additional costs onto their clients.
Employment in the manufacturing sector
continued to rise in June, attributed to
investment in technology departments, new plant
openings and efforts to increase production
capacities.
Despite the challenges, investment in
additional equipment, new product releases and
forecasts of better sales fueled business
optimism in June.
“The PMI survey showed that cost inflation,
which ran at the highest since mid-2022, curbed
growth of sales and production in June.
Companies sought to protect margins by lifting
selling prices to a substantial extent and
tried to keep a lid on expenses by restricting
input purchases and job creation,” said
Pollyanna De Lima, economics associate director
at S&P Global.
“Although exchange rate depreciation could have
bolstered exports, the increase in prices seems
to have eroded international competitiveness.
External orders still rose, but only
marginally.”
Contact us
Partnering with ICIS unlocks a vision of a future you can trust and achieve. We leverage our unrivalled network of industry experts to deliver a comprehensive market view based on independent and reliable data, insight and analytics.
Contact us to learn how we can support you as you transact today and plan for tomorrow.
READ MORE
![](https://cjp-rbi-icis.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2023/12/11160203/ContactUs_Services.jpg)